Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "pr32500".
Did you mean:
pr26500
2014 Jun 10
6
[LLVMdev] Suggestions for optimizations
...e most significant
difference are listed here:
* loop unrolling
20000422-1.c
20000412-6.c
20050224-1.c
20000412-4.c
20100416-1.c
950714-1.c
pending-4.c
* structures
20010910-1.c (with LLVM from svn, this is even worse than LLVM 3.4)
20020206-2.c
20020402-2.c
* local arrays access
930526-1.c
pr32500.c
* merging same calls to one function to improve code size when optimized
931004-11.c
* better default inlining (probably)
pr19005.c
* other
pr46019.c
pr46909-1.c
We will try to improve some of these optimizations by ourselves, but I
do not know when will we get to it, so I am posing...