Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "pr32412".
Did you mean:
pr24126
2017 Apr 02
2
Which doxygen doc should I look into?
...pfaffe at gmail.com>:
> Hi chenwj,
>
> http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h_source.html is the correct one. The
> other two are remnants from older doxygen deployments.
>
> Here's an open PR about that same problem you can use to track progress on
> this: http://llvm.org/pr32412
>
> Actually, the PR doesn't currently mention stray outdated files like
> http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h-source.html
>
> Best,
> Philip
>
>
>
> 2017-04-02 1:19 GMT+02:00 陳韋任 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>...
2017 Apr 01
2
Which doxygen doc should I look into?
Hi All,
I am going to clean up those doxygen links on LLVM Programmer’s
Manual [1], some are lost and some are too old.
However, I am confused on which doxygen link I should pick up. I see
there are mutiple links exist on LLVM web site
for LLVM classes. Take class Statistic as example, there are:
- http://llvm.org/doxygen/Statistic_8h-source.html (the oldest
one, I believe it's
2017 Jun 28
3
LLVM docs links broken
The docs found on google have been vastly out of date for quite a while.
For that time, http://llvm.org/doxygen/ has been the correct home of the
API docs. See also http://llvm.org/pr32412.
The server move last weekend dropped the legacy files. It'll take the
google index a bit to notice. robots.txt currently prevents indexing of
/doxygen, because there was an issue with the robots, I've been told.
Cheers,
Philip
2017-06-28 6:41 GMT+02:00 Dipanjan Das via llvm-dev <llvm...
2017 Jun 28
3
LLVM docs links broken
On 27 June 2017 at 19:11, George Burgess IV via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> There was some kind of server move that happened recently; I'm
> assuming this is a side-effect of that.
I'd vaguely understood the old links had been deprecated for a while.
Unfortunately they're still the top Google results when you search for
the relevant classes, which is