search for: pr28970

Hi, I wanted to revive this issue of supporting asm goto (Bug 9295<https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9295>). As was already proposed, the best way seems to be introducing new IR. If we're changing the IR, we should probably provide an infrastructure that solves or at least enables future support for things like: 1. MS-style inline asm jmps and goto (Bug

...ferences in the inline assembly (Bug 28970<https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28970>), taking into account module/file-scope inline assembly. Unless we decide to address #1 in some way, this seems completely orthogonal to "asm goto". While I'd love to see a good resolution to PR28970, I don't think it makes sense to couple the two together. Among other things, none of my concerns about "asm goto" apply to simply exposing the symbols defined. 3. Provide some information about the cost of the inline assembly? (I’m not sure if we want to couple it with this is...