Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pr27785".
Did you mean:
pr21780
2018 Sep 25
3
[cfe-dev] New warnings when building trunk with GCC 9
+ Erik, who implemented DR1579
Originally, I had the warning similar to GCC's warning, but took it out due
to not having DR1579 implemented in clang (warning changed in r243594)
Erik in r274291 implemented DR1579, although PR27785 didn't mention
anything about std::move
It looks like what's happening is that Clang and GCC handles the return
differently. Clang needs the std::move call to use the move constructor
while GCC will use the move constructor with or without the std::move
call. This means that the warning...
2018 Sep 16
2
[cfe-dev] New warnings when building trunk with GCC 9
Yes, we should produce this warning in C++11 mode too. (I could be
misrecalling, but I think the rationale for the current behaviour is based
on historical GCC behaviour.)
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018, 10:04 David Blaikie via cfe-dev, <
cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Fair point made on that thread - that this is a DR, so technically the
> std::move is pessimizing even in C++11 mode.