Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "pr2545".
2009 Mar 17
0
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
...on x86_64. I put the list of outstanding bugs on a wiki page for
tracking and reference:
http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/HowTo:_LLVM-based_cross_compiler
I'll try to get the patch committed to llvm-gcc piece-meal. It looks like
part of the patch includes the fix for http://llvm.org/PR2545 -- Chris said
he's OK with the patch being committed, is there any reason it hasn't been
applied yet? Does anyone mind if I do?
Misha
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20090317/568419c4/...
2009 Mar 18
3
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
...Dale?) please review
> Sandeep's patch? The patch works for me in building an LLVM-based
> cross-compiler from x86_64/Linux to ARM/Linux.
> I have been able to build without the patch to the asm file, but
> several people have reported needing the asm patch on http://llvm.org/PR2545
> .
Looks OK to me. The asm file is the only thing I'd have reservations
about (that isn't marked as a local change, btw, and I don't think it
was), but the parentheses should work fine.
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com
>...
2009 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
...tise (Dale?) please review Sandeep's
> patch? The patch works for me in building an LLVM-based cross-compiler from
> x86_64/Linux to ARM/Linux.
> I have been able to build without the patch to the asm file, but several
> people have reported needing the asm patch on http://llvm.org/PR2545 .
>
> Looks OK to me.
>
Thanks for the review. Sandeep, I've committed your patch (with some
modifications) to arm.h -- please sync and see if this version works for
you.
> The asm file is the only thing I'd have reservations about (that isn't
> marked as a local chan...
2009 Mar 13
4
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
Attached is the patch I've been building arm-eabi with, which might
help with linux-gnueabi. I disable multilib to get around several bugs
with thumb. I build cross binutils first, then llvm, then llvm-gcc
with newlib merged in.
The following bugs need to be addressed for these non-Darwin ARM targets:
1388
2313
2545
2985
deep
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Misha Brukman <brukman at
2009 Mar 18
0
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
...h llvm-gcc/ARM expertise (Dale?) please review Sandeep's
patch? The patch works for me in building an LLVM-based cross-compiler from
x86_64/Linux to ARM/Linux.
I have been able to build without the patch to the asm file, but several
people have reported needing the asm patch on http://llvm.org/PR2545 .
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Sandeep Patel <deeppatel1987 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Attached is the patch I've been building arm-eabi with, which might
> help with linux-gnueabi. I disable multilib to get around several bugs
> with thumb. I build cross binutils first, then ll...
2009 Mar 17
4
[LLVMdev] Consumer ARM platform suitable for LLVM development?
...ist of outstanding bugs on a wiki page for
> tracking and reference:
> http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/index.php/HowTo:_LLVM-based_cross_compiler
>
> I'll try to get the patch committed to llvm-gcc piece-meal. It looks like
> part of the patch includes the fix for http://llvm.org/PR2545 -- Chris said
> he's OK with the patch being committed, is there any reason it hasn't been
> applied yet? Does anyone mind if I do?
>
> Misha
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://l...