Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pr24071".
Did you mean:
pr24078
2016 May 12
4
[RFC] New diagnostic handler for llc
...d instead just exits after the first error
that it encounters. This is very different from the behaviour of clang
and other front ends, who try to report as many errors as possible
before exiting.
I think this is very important for testing LLVM's CodeGen in a more
robust fashion. For instance, PR24071, for which I have submitted a
patch recently [1], would've been uncovered by our current tests,
instead of being reported by a clang user through a .c file.
I've uploaded a sample patch for the new diagnostic handler on
Phabricator [2]. With this patch, we currently get 27 failures in
chec...
2016 May 12
3
[RFC] New diagnostic handler for llc
On 12 May 2016 at 16:19, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev
<llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> The problem in PR24071 seemed to be that clang proceeded with compilation
> even though the inline asm was not valid. I'm not sure that there is value
> in trying to make the backend continue compiling code that most likely has
> no meaning.
I'm not 100% convinced that is the case here. The inline asm...