Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pr18996".
2014 Oct 16
3
[LLVMdev] Performance regression on ARM
...g the lines of working
with the implementer, trying to understand the reason of the
regression. It could be a bad implementation or just a target-specific
reason for the regression. Depending on the importance of the
regression and of the patch, I'd consider turning it off for ARM (for
example, PR18996) and later investigating why.
I'd only consider reverting the patch in extreme circumstances, for
example, if we're close to a release AND the regression is big AND the
patch is a new feature, etc. I believe that's what you were concerned
about. :)
cheers,
--renato
2014 Oct 16
4
[LLVMdev] Performance regression on ARM
Folks,
First win of the benchmark buildbot!
http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/graph?plot.0=49.128.2&highlight_run=31861
It seems mandel-2 had a huge regression a few commits ago, and based
on a quick look, it may have to do with the inst combine changes. I
haven't investigated yet, but this is the first time I spot
regressions on test-suite, so I'd like to first congratulate