Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pr1776".
Did you mean:
pr17769
2007 Oct 19
0
[LLVMdev] movaps being generated despite alignment 1 being specified
On Oct 18, 2007, at 1:52 PM, Chuck Rose III wrote:
>
> Here are the instructions for evaluateDependents. The JITter
> hasn’t compiled foo yet. What’s confusing to me is why did my
> movups suddenly become a movaps? All the stores and loads have
> align 1 on them.
Hi Chuck,
I believe this is a bug but am unable to reproduce it with the test
case you've provided. I
2007 Oct 18
3
[LLVMdev] movaps being generated despite alignment 1 being specified
Hello LLVMers,
High order bit:
Presence of a called function is causing a store on an unrelated vector
to generate an aligned store rather an unaligned one despite unaligned
store being indicated in the associated StoreInst.
Details:
I pulled down the latest source, so this is something I'm finding with
the current LLVM. I'm hoping you'll have an idea what's