Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr15205".
2013 Feb 08
0
[LLVMdev] Rotated loop identification
...rewritten in terms of %b, you probably wouldn't need the invariant any more).
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20121210/158601.html
But really, the only thing likely to make it onto trunk for this bug is the SCEV fix mentioned above. More details can be discussed in PR15205.
-Andy
2013 Feb 07
3
[LLVMdev] Rotated loop identification
> Thanks for the details. Please add them to a bug report.
I will do this.
> InstCombine is certainly interfering with our ability to analyze the loop. I think the problem is that ScalarEvolution cannot reason about signed division. This is a general problem independent of your target. At the moment I'm not sure if we can teach ScalarEvolution to reason about this, or if we can defer
2013 Feb 08
3
[LLVMdev] Rotated loop identification
...have a reasonably-large group of contributors in favor of an invariant intrinsic and we should move forward on that basis?
Thanks again,
Hal
>
> But really, the only thing likely to make it onto trunk for this bug
> is the SCEV fix mentioned above. More details can be discussed in
> PR15205.
>
> -Andy
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>