search for: pr14524

...hey could be separate, but I'd >> expect the assembler and object file emission to be tested separately >> already - the only benefit to testing particular IR->object & >> separately testing particular IR->assembly is probably not worthwhile. > > I cite PR13303/PR14524, where asm and direct-object output differ. > This came up early in my LLVM career and has doubtless poisoned my > outlook for life.... > > In many cases I think the same test _source_ can be used to check both > asm and object, with appropriate RUN lines, and whether you want to &gt...

...go in LLVM - yeah, they could be separate, but I'd > expect the assembler and object file emission to be tested separately > already - the only benefit to testing particular IR->object & > separately testing particular IR->assembly is probably not worthwhile. I cite PR13303/PR14524, where asm and direct-object output differ. This came up early in my LLVM career and has doubtless poisoned my outlook for life.... In many cases I think the same test _source_ can be used to check both asm and object, with appropriate RUN lines, and whether you want to count that as the same or s...

On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Robinson, Paul <Paul.Robinson at am.sony.com> wrote: >>>> 2. Relying of assembly directive emissions (i.e. .cfi_*), which is >>>> cumbersome and misses a lot of things like actual DWARF encoding. >>> >>> I'm not sure what you mean by "actual DWARF encoding" here. >>> (disclaimer: I've only