Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "pr1386".
2008 Jan 30
2
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...se. Overall the test results look decent
with a couple exceptions.
You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version
of xcode do you have installed?
Can you send me the following files?
SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.*
SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.*
Thanks,
Tanya
On Jan 26, 2008, at 6:43 AM, Takanori Ishikawa wrote:
> My test results for the LLVM 2.2 prerelease.
>
> === Q. Target ===
>
> * Mac OS X 10.4.11
> * 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
> * MacBook
>
> % uname -a
> Darwin macbook.local 8.11.1 Darwin Kernel Vers...
2008 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
Dear Tanya:
> You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing. What version
> of xcode do you have installed?
Xcode 2.4.1
> Can you send me the following files?
> SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/2008-01-07-LongDouble.*
> SingleSource/Regression/C/Output/PR1386.*
OK, I attached those files (llvm-2.2-test-output.tar.gz)
Best regards,
2008/1/30, Tanya Lattner <tonic at nondot.org>:
> Thanks for testing the release. Overall the test results look decent
> with a couple exceptions.
>
> You also have a few CBE failures that I am not seeing....
2014 May 04
12
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Benchmarking subset of the test suite
...ession/C++/global_type
SingleSource/Regression/C++/ofstream_ctor
SingleSource/Regression/C/pointer_arithmetic
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_member
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method
SingleSource/Regression/C++/pointer_method2
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR10189
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR640
SingleSource/Regression/C++/short_circuit_dtor
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc
SingleSource/Regression/C/testtrace
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-04-17-PrintfChar
SingleSource/UnitTests/2002-05-...
2008 Jan 26
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
My test results for the LLVM 2.2 prerelease.
=== Q. Target ===
* Mac OS X 10.4.11
* 2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
* MacBook
% uname -a
Darwin macbook.local 8.11.1 Darwin Kernel Version 8.11.1:
Wed Oct 10 18:23:28 PDT 2007;
root:xnu-792.25.20~1/RELEASE_I386 i386 i386
=== Q. How you built the release ===
* objDir != srcDir
* Release build
* llvm-gcc-4.2 from source
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/
If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following:
1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release
(default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both.
2) Run 'make check'.
3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'.
4) When
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...ngleSource/Regression/C/sumarraymalloc | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2005-05-06-LongLongSignedShift | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/sumarray2d | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/ConstructorDestructorAttributes | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2003-05-21-UnionTest | * | * |
SingleSource/Regression/C/2008-01-07-LongDouble...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0098 1328 0.0049 * 0.0047 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 | 0.0029 820 0.0030 * 0.0029 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | 0.0041 532 0.0014 *...
2008 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
...0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice | 0.0036 1372 0.0021 * 0.0021 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 | 0.0011 852 0.0013 * 0.0015 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.00 | - - n/a n/a
SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 | 0.0010 448 0.0007 *...
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
... 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/DuffsDevice |
> 0.0000 1084 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/PR1386 |
> 0.0000 588 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00
> 0.00 * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/PR491 |
> 0.0100 456 0.0000 *...
2009 Oct 20
0
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
Hi Tanya,
> 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
> directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a
> pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories.
Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu.
> 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note
> that you need to
2009 Oct 20
1
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
...- n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> DuffsDevice | 0.0000 1084
> 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00
> * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> PR1386 | 0.0000 588
> 0.0000 * 0.0100 | 0.00 0.00 0.00
> * 0.01 | - - n/a n/a
> SingleSource/Regression/C/
> PR491 | 0.0100 456
>...
2009 Oct 17
12
[LLVMdev] 2.6 pre-release2 ready for testing
LLVMers,
2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community.
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
To test llvm-gcc:
1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects
directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre-
compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself.
2) Run make check,
2009 Feb 07
11
[LLVMdev] 2.5 Pre-release1 available for testing
LLVMers,
The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing:
http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/
If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release.
Please do the following:
1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or
use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can).
2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log
3) Run "make
2014 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
Hi Stepan,
Sorry for the delay. It's great that you are working on MergeFunctions
as well and I agree, we should definitely try to combine our efforts to
improve MergeFunctions.
Just to give you some context, the pass (with the similar function
merging patch) is already being used in a production setting. From my
point of view, it would be better if we focus on improving its
capability
2014 Jan 30
3
[LLVMdev] MergeFunctions: reduce complexity to O(log(N))
...0.02 218797
PpmdDecoder.ll 40 81362 0 0.02 81328 * * *
PpmdEncoder.ll 24 73540 0 0.02 73506 0 0.02 70726
PpmdHandler.ll 34 195865 0 0.02 195832 0 0.03 195832
PpmdRegister.ll 5 14936 0 0.01 14902 0 0.01 14902
PpmdZip.ll 18 67245 3 0.01 64946 3 0.01 64946
ppowmod.ll 1 11109 0 0.01 11082 0 0.01 11082
PR1386.ll 1 2570 0 0.01 2558 0 0.01 2558
PR491.ll 3 4997 0 0.01 4985 0 0.01 4985
PR640.ll 4 19066 0 0.01 19054 0 0.01 19054
prboard.ll 1 24762 0 0.01 24729 0 0.01 24729
prepair.ll 1 8790 0 0.01 8757 0 0.01 8757
preprocess.ll 1 12481 0 0.01 12451 0 0.01 12451
prestrict.ll 1 16735 0 0.01 16702 0 0.01 16702...