Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr13392".
Did you mean:
pr13303
2003 Dec 21
1
[LLVMdev] gcc ICE (PR13392) and LLVM
Hi LLVMers,
there were a gcc ICE problem discussed in current mail list.
Chris was right here:
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2003-December/000693.html
saying that the PR 12544 is not really the corresponding issue :)
The correct one is PR 13392:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13392
Interesting fact is that -O2 (or -O3) goes somehow around this
2012 Jul 19
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM compile speed significantly slower than GCC (w/ test case)
Thanks, Matt. This is great information. Sounds like Chandler is looking into the details of what's going on.
-Jim
On Jul 19, 2012, at 3:55 PM, Matt Fischer <mattfischer84 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I've been doing some profiling of LLVM on our codebase, to see how it
> stacks up to the existing GCC build that we do. The primary thing I'm
> focusing on at the moment is
2012 Jul 19
4
[LLVMdev] LLVM compile speed significantly slower than GCC (w/ test case)
I've been doing some profiling of LLVM on our codebase, to see how it
stacks up to the existing GCC build that we do. The primary thing I'm
focusing on at the moment is build speed, and in this regard LLVM
seems to be pretty all over the map. On some files it seems to go
quite a bit faster than GCC, and on others it's slower, leading to an
aggregate build time for our repository