Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr1299".
Did you mean:
pr1297
2007 May 15
1
[LLVMdev] llvm 2.0 release announcement [draft]
...e and effort into it,
and it could grow to be an important component in the future.
>> x. Evan added support for the X86-64 large code model to the JIT, which
>> is useful if JIT'd function bodies are more than 2G away from library
>> functions.
> Not true. See PR1299, which still hasn't been fixed.
Actually, it is true - PR1299 not being fixed does not mean the work
wasn't done. I did not claim that he fixed every possible x86-64 jit bug,
certainly not on platforms we don't have available to test.
I asked Evan to look into this PR, but if you...
2007 May 14
0
[LLVMdev] llvm 2.0 release announcement [draft]
...it is even possible. It's as hard as reconstructing a C++
class declaration from LLVM IR.
> x. Evan added support for the X86-64 large code model to the JIT,
> which is useful if JIT'd function bodies are more than 2G away from
> library functions.
>
Not true. See PR1299, which still hasn't been fixed.
2007 May 14
3
[LLVMdev] llvm 2.0 release announcement [draft]
Hi Everyone,
It is getting to be that time again. I've scoured llvm-commits and
collected a list of some of the major features we've developed since
the last status update (from Feb 21). Please take a look and send me
(off list) additions, feedback, corrections, etc. As usual, if I
missed something, it's probably because there is such a huge amount
of stuff happening,