Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "pr1278".
Did you mean:
1278
2008 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] an llvm-gcc bug
On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:22 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Devang Patel wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Devang Patel wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>>>
2008 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] an llvm-gcc bug
On Feb 15, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Devang Patel wrote:
>
> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Devang Patel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Feb 15, 2008, at 10:08 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Alternatively I can take the Padding bit into account in the
>>>>>>
2008 Feb 15
4
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 44, Issue 47
...ode and is quite error prone.
> >
> > ...but giving up in this case is easy enough, ok, I can do that.
>
> Cool, thanks Dale! I think it would be reasonable to give up in
> nested struct cases, etc. We can always improve it later, and that
> will get us the obvious case in PR1278.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:47:47 -0800
> From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com>
> Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Question on link error
> To: "'Anton Korobeynikov'" <asl...
2008 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] LLVMdev Digest, Vol 44, Issue 47
...> > >
> > > ...but giving up in this case is easy enough, ok, I can do that.
> >
> > Cool, thanks Dale! I think it would be reasonable to give up in
> > nested struct cases, etc. We can always improve it later, and that
> > will get us the obvious case in PR1278.
> >
> > -Chris
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 6
> > Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:47:47 -0800
> > From: "Ted Neward" <ted at tedneward.com>
> > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Question on link error
> &g...