Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr1260".
Did you mean:
pr1269
2007 Mar 19
0
[LLVMdev] A few inline assembly questions
...n anything pushing for MMX
intrinsic support (most clients we've worked with so far use SSE2 instead
of MMX). LLVM definitely needs to support the MMX intrinsics, when Bill
has your testcase working, I'd appreciate it if you could try Qt with MMX
enabled again. I filed http://llvm.org/PR1260 to track your specific
testcase (PR1222 is the bug for MMX intrinsics in general). If you want
to see when this is completed, it is easiest to CC yourself on the bug.
If there is anything else we can do, please don't hesitate to email the
list further (or file bugs) :)
-Chris
--
http://...
2007 Mar 18
2
[LLVMdev] A few inline assembly questions
Hey,
I'm contemplating adding llvm-gcc as a core platform to Qt, meaning we'd
release Qt unless we would make sure it compiles and works with llvm-gcc but
I have some problems with making it work cleanly so I just wanted to ask a
few simple questions.
The problems refer to llvm and llvm-gcc from respectively cvs/svn which, I'm
assuming, means upcoming 2.0 release.
1) we added a
2007 Mar 19
1
[LLVMdev] A few inline assembly questions
...nsic support (most clients we've worked with so far use SSE2
> instead
> of MMX). LLVM definitely needs to support the MMX intrinsics, when
> Bill
> has your testcase working, I'd appreciate it if you could try Qt
> with MMX
> enabled again. I filed http://llvm.org/PR1260 to track your specific
> testcase (PR1222 is the bug for MMX intrinsics in general). If you
> want
> to see when this is completed, it is easiest to CC yourself on the
> bug.
>
Also, if you could do some performance comparisons between GCC and
LLVM, it would be a good measurem...