Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "pr12517".
2013 Jun 06
5
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
It's probably PR12517.
Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH:
$ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH
RPATH
$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin
This will slow things down if th...
2013 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
On 06/06/2013 18:04, Hans Wennborg wrote:> It's probably PR12517.
>
> Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH:
>
> $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep
RPATH
> RPATH
>
$ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin
To av...
2013 Jun 07
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
> It's probably PR12517.
>
> Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH:
>
> $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep RPATH
> RPATH
> $ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCore-3.3-rc3.obj/Release+Asserts/bin
>...
2013 Jun 07
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
...ATH or not? A
1sec startup pause on some (admittedly crazy) systems seems like a big deal
to me.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Bill Wendling <wendling at apple.com> wrote:
> On Jun 6, 2013, at 9:04 AM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> > It's probably PR12517.
> >
> > Looking at the clang binary, it's got a /home/ dir in RPATH:
> >
> > $ objdump -p clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64/bin/clang | grep
> RPATH
> > RPATH
> >
> $ORIGIN/../lib:/home/aadgrand/tmp/LLVM-3.3rc3/rc3/Phase3/Release+Asserts/llvmCor...
2013 Jun 06
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
Hi Bill,
I was running some benchmarks and was surprised that the startup
performance of your binaries is much worse than the stable binaries
for 3.2
I've used:
http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/clang+llvm-3.2-x86_64-linux-ubuntu-12.04.tar.gz
vs
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3/clang+llvm-3.3rc3-Ubuntu-12.04.2-x86_64.tar.gz
On a simple hello.c file:
/ssd/bench$ TIMEFORMAT="%E"
2013 Jun 04
2
[LLVMdev] [3.3 Release] 3.3rc3 Now Available
Hi LLVM-ites!
We are doing a quick test of 3.3rc3. Our testers did a quick turn around and created binaries which you can test. Please give them a go and let us know how they work for you. They are here:
http://llvm.org/pre-releases/3.3/rc3
We don't have a lot of time remaining in the release cycle, so please do whatever you can to make sure they are solid. In particular, make sure that