Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pr11105".
Did you mean:
pr11107
2011 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() on dbg_value machine instructions
I'm investigating a bug associated with debug information that manifests
itself in the XCore backend (PR11105). I'd like to understand what the
expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() is when it is called on a
dbg_value machine instruction.
Currently the XCore target replaces the frame index with the frame
register and sets the next operand to the byte offset from the frame
register. A quick gl...
2011 Oct 10
0
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() on dbg_value machine instructions
On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Richard Osborne wrote:
> I'm investigating a bug associated with debug information that manifests
> itself in the XCore backend (PR11105). I'd like to understand what the
> expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() is when it is called on a
> dbg_value machine instruction.
That is up to the target.
The TII::emitFrameIndexDebugValue() hook is called to insert DBG_VALUE instructions referring to values on the stack.
Th...
2011 Oct 11
1
[LLVMdev] Expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() on dbg_value machine instructions
On 10/10/11 19:19, Jakob Stoklund Olesen wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Richard Osborne wrote:
>> I'm investigating a bug associated with debug information that manifests
>> itself in the XCore backend (PR11105). I'd like to understand what the
>> expected behavior of eliminateFrameIndex() is when it is called on a
>> dbg_value machine instruction.
> That is up to the target.
>
> The TII::emitFrameIndexDebugValue() hook is called to insert DBG_VALUE instructions referring to value...