search for: ppoe

...*not* seeing traffic, even after limiting to half the DSL line speed and upping a 6mb file to a remote site via scp... I''m now almost totally convinced that traffic is eluding the filters because it''s *actually* traffic out ppp0 (I''m currently using the Debian userland pppoe thingy), and I''m tc''ing on eth4 (to which the DSL device is attached). However earlier in the game, when I tried to shape ppp0, the kernel would reliably oops after about a minute. What am I doing wrong? -- Cheers, Mattt. icq : 117539757 aboveNetworks...

...have pptp vpn concentrators on their ends. The purpose is that all of the businesses will be at an offsite location together for a 3 day sale. I have the box working now with the latest ver of shorewall with two nics on this fedora box eth0 will be on the net eth1 loc. eth0 will authenacating ppoe over high gain wireless from an temp ISP. The lan is on 192.168.50.1 on eth1. I have the vpns working now all on that lan, I can access all of the businesses servers from this one fedora box. Now what I would like to do is ask for advice about this. To provide security between the busine...

I have been successfully implementing load balancing gateways for multiple ISP links at various locations using Julian''s patches and as suggested in LARTC HowTo. At one location, one of the ISPs is providing connectivity through a PPOE DSL link which has to be dialled in everytime to connect. The gateway has been configured on a Fedora Core 3 based system and I have recompiled the 2.6.12 kernel after applying Julian''s patches. I have configured the DSL modem in bridge mode and connected it to an ethernet interface on...

Hello guys, I have two ISP's connected to my router. One via eth2, second one via ADSL modem, with ppoe doing on my Centos 5 . The problem I have is, that when ADSL fails , interface ppp0 is removed. This also removes my static routes configured for this interface. I do not want that, as I have load balancing configured and default route is removed when ppp0 interface disapears. This is my ifcfg-pp...

Please point me in the right direction.... My ISP is giving me an IPv6 prefix, but to get that I have to: The current Speedstream ADSL router will be configured as a bridge. I will have to set up a Linux (read Centos, I hope) router that will connect ethernet to the Speedstream but run PPPoE to his network and get both the IPv4 and IPv6 route delegations. There is no easy way that I know of to test this ahead of time. I basically have to get the box configed, have my ISP switch the Speedstream to briding mode, and GO! So I need to do some reading....

Hi, I am using Shorewall 2.0.6 on Debian with iptables 1.29. Before I was using Shorewall 2.0.3 and If work correctly, I am not sure that my problems begin after upgrade to 2.0.6, but my problem is that I can''t see some websites on the pc clients ( such as www.microsoft.com ), but some websites yes ( they are not in the pc cache ). My config is Shorewall as gateway/router of

Hello. My host is CentOS 5.3 and Xen is v3.2 (from RPMs provided from Gitco). One of my DomUs is Trixbox that has been having some intermittent issues that I believe are due to it being behind my firewall (which is a Linksys router). My ISP gives me two dynamic IPs, so I would like to put my Trixbox DomU on this second dynamic IP. The Trixbox DomU is an HVM DomU. What is the best way to do

I am building a CentOS 5 box to ship to Houston which will be a gateway system on an SBC DSL connection for a while until the client gets a T1 installed. I have read up on using adsl-setup and related software, but never done PPPoE on anything but LinkSys commodity boxes. I have examined the adsl-setup script, and I think I understand how this works, but want to be sure I understand things first. The box has dual 10/100/1000 NICs, eth0 for the internal LAN, and eth1 for the PPPoE interface, and later the T1. After running...

Thanks for the tips Brian, Actually, I have many sorts of links, line PPOE ADSL, PPPOA ADSL which a use PPTP over PPOA relay, radio links that connect in the ethernet interface and cable modems. To change the SFQ queue size I must recompile de kernel? I think a saw some messages talking about that. One other thing, I have the 1:10 a 1:20 class, let''...

Hi all, I have a little problem with my home-made slackware linux server. Here is the scenario: 1. I have a local wifi network 2. my server do masquerading and exit in internet via a PPPoE connection Goals: 1. not use SQUID 2. shaping the traffic with classes 3. emule connection must have minimum priority and a band-limit of 10KBytes/s in uplink (server--->internet) Any idea? Thx, Diego -- Diego Giardinetto Skype Name: cpuzorro MSN: cpuoverload@hotmail.it

...rop (since I''m testing on an incoming interface and dropped packets don''t count for bandwidth used calcs). However, I seem to be able to get *extremely* close to the max with this patch Obviously all the numbers are hard coded, but they should be suitable for all ATM users. PPoE users will need to do something different (if someone can supply the details then I will see what we can do to make a more generic patch and use module params. Note: That this code will probably affect the policer and CBQ modules in the same way as HTB, however, I don''t have such a set...

...ver fiber, breaking out with a media converter to one Ethernet interface. At present, I am retaining the static feed over copper on eth0, and taking the two new feeds via vlans on eth1. I have configured the static IP feed on eth1:790 as vlan 790, and that seems to be fine, and eth1:780 as the PPPOE feed, and brought up PPPOE to give me an IP, that is configured as interface ppp0. The ppp0 feed works fine. I have trouble understanding how to refer to eth1:790 in the configuration files. Should I just call it eth1 or can I refer to it as eth1:790? Chris Mason -- This message has been scan...

I have a server with dual nic's running centos 5.2 1 nic connects to the cable modem, which has 15m d and 2m up, but speed tests barely come back at 5mb down including road runner's internal speed test. I hook up my laptop to the same modem, same port, using the same cable and I get 17mb down. I have ruled out iptables, nics (because same result on both nics), cables, cable modem(with

Shorewall version 2.2.1 2 Interface setup. eth1: 10.10.1.3 eth0: 192.168.1.2 modem is 192.168.1.1 I need to be able to connect to my adsl modem, but when shorewall is up I get connection rejected. I have added "192.168.1.1 RETURN" above the line "192.168.0.0/16 logdrop # RFC 1918" in "/etc/shorewall/rfc1918" but still getting connection rejected Is there