search for: ppcinstrformats

...s for these particular operations > - setOperationAction(ISD::MEMBARRIER, MVT::Other, Expand); > - > // PowerPC has no SREM/UREM instructions > setOperationAction(ISD::SREM, MVT::i32, Expand); > setOperationAction(ISD::UREM, MVT::i32, Expand); > Index: lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td > =================================================================== > --- lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td (revision 54985) > +++ lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td (working copy) > @@ -309,6 +309,17 @@ > let Inst{31} = 0; > } > > +class XForm_24_sync&l...

...- // PowerPC has no intrinsics for these particular operations - setOperationAction(ISD::MEMBARRIER, MVT::Other, Expand); - // PowerPC has no SREM/UREM instructions setOperationAction(ISD::SREM, MVT::i32, Expand); setOperationAction(ISD::UREM, MVT::i32, Expand); Index: lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td =================================================================== --- lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td (revision 54985) +++ lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td (working copy) @@ -309,6 +309,17 @@ let Inst{31} = 0; } +class XForm_24_sync<bits<6> opcode, bits<10> x...

...r operations >> - setOperationAction(ISD::MEMBARRIER, MVT::Other, Expand); >> - >> // PowerPC has no SREM/UREM instructions >> setOperationAction(ISD::SREM, MVT::i32, Expand); >> setOperationAction(ISD::UREM, MVT::i32, Expand); >> Index: lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td >> =================================================================== >> --- lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td (revision 54985) >> +++ lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCInstrFormats.td (working copy) >> @@ -309,6 +309,17 @@ >> let Inst{31} = 0; >> } >> &gt...

On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:18 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC. I've modelled > my patch (attached) on the implementation in X86, but when I try and > compile my test file (also attached) with llc I get the error "Cannot > yet select: 0x10fa4ad0: ch = MemBarrier 0x10fa4828, 0x10fa4c68, > 0x10fa4be0,

This looks OK to check in, do you have write access? On Aug 21, 2008, at 6:38 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: > Dale Johannesen wrote: >> On Aug 19, 2008, at 7:18 AMPDT, Gary Benson wrote: >>> I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC. I've >>> modelled my patch (attached) on the implementation in X86, but >>> when I try and compile my test

Hi all, I'm trying to implement llvm.memory.barrier on PowerPC. I've modelled my patch (attached) on the implementation in X86, but when I try and compile my test file (also attached) with llc I get the error "Cannot yet select: 0x10fa4ad0: ch = MemBarrier 0x10fa4828, 0x10fa4c68, 0x10fa4be0, 0x10fa4be0, 0x10fa4be0, 0x10fa4be0". This presumably means my "membarrier"

...not sure how to do this in a good way because of CVS and since everything is kind of related. CallABIELF.patch file changes PPCISelLowering.cpp file for ELF ABI call support CalleeSavedLinuxPPC.patch changes the callee saved registers for function calls Creqv.patch adds some XLForm_1 classes to PPCInstrFormats.td for the CREQV instruction support Frame.patch modifies PPCFrameInfo.h to take into account the ELF ABI for frame manipulation JITLinuxPPC.patch adds support to detect a Linux/PPC JIT and separate the ELF ABI with the MachO ABI I didn't sign any licence paper for LLVM. Let me know if I h...

I think the easiest thing for you to do is to define a separate CALL instruction with a different set of Defs. This instruction should only be selected when the predicate isMacho is true. Also update PPCRegisterInfo.cpp getCalleeSavedRegs() to return a different list when subtarget->isMachoABI() is true. Evan On Feb 14, 2007, at 7:19 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > Hi Chris, >

Hi Chris, Chris Lattner wrote: >> 2) Line 369 of PPCInstrInfo.td, we declare the non-callee saved registers. >> However, Linux and Darwin do not have the same set >> of non-callee saved registers. I don't know how to make the if(isDarwin) test >> in here >> > > Take a look at ARM/ARMRegisterInfo.td for an example of this I tried to define Defs just