search for: powy

Hello, The purpose of the llvm.powi intrinsic isn't clear to me. Why is llvm.powi preferable to multiplication and division for small constant powers (e.g., 1/x, x*x, etc.)? Why is it preferable to llvm.pow for large variable powers? I'm also curious about the time bound. I'm assuming that powi(x,1000000) doesn't do a million multiplications... Do any architectures have

> The purpose of the llvm.powi intrinsic isn't clear to me. Why is > llvm.powi preferable to multiplication and division for small constant > powers (e.g., 1/x, x*x, etc.)? Why is it preferable to llvm.pow for > large variable powers? I'm also curious about the time bound. I'm > assuming that powi(x,1000000) doesn't do a million multiplications... > Do any

Hello, all. To get my feet wet and hopefully make a small contribution, I was looking for something small to start with. I settled on one of the suggestions from the CodeGen readme: > Reassociate should turn things like: > > int factorial(int X) { > return X*X*X*X*X*X*X*X; > } > > into llvm.powi calls, allowing the code generator to > produce balanced multiplication

Dear all, I'm using IntrinsicLowering class to remove all intrinsics in LLVM byte-code. Unfortunately, I meet several problems: 1. Why I can not get the type of CallInst *CI? !CI->getType()->isVoidTy() is not working and how to solve it? This type information has some impacts with intrinsics such as flt_rounds. 2. Why Intrinsic::vastart and Intrinsic::powi are excluded from

Hi Hao Shen, > 1. Why I can not get the type of CallInst *CI? > !CI->getType()->isVoidTy() is not working and how to solve it? what does "not working" mean? It should work. > 2. Why Intrinsic::vastart and Intrinsic::powi are excluded from > IntrinsicLowering function? > There are no way to lower them at the byte-code level? For vastart, it probably isn't

...long as we can but may end up having to put it in. I want to gather information before this happens. Can you please direct me to any information you have about Microsoft Active Directory within a Samba environment. -- Mark Baylis Swyddog Cynnal Rhwydwaith Network Support Officer mark.baylis@powys.gov.uk Tel: 0845 0580428 FAX: 01597 826221 Mae'r e bost hwn ac unrhyw atodiad iddo yn gyfrinachol ac fe'i bwriedir ar gyfer y sawl a enwir arno yn unig. Gall gynnwys gwybodaeth freintiedig. Os yw wedi eich cyrraedd trwy gamgymeriad ni ellwch ei gopio, ei ddosbarthu na'i ddangos i unrh...

In the following example with gcc style builtins, in once case llvm.powi.f64 is emitted and in the other just a call to library function powf. ~/llvm/build/Debug+Asserts/bin/clang -S -emit-llvm pow1.c Why is that? Is there a way to force the call to an llvm style builtin? Tia. Reed -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pow1.c Type: text/x-csrc

Hi, I'm stumped by how to handle fpowi. Here is the context: my architecture has i64, f32, and f64 registers. No i32. For calls & returns, we promote i32 to i64. There is no support in the architecture to perform fpowi - it has to go through the runtime. I'm using gfortran + dragonegg + llvm3.4 to generate .ll files via plugin. The fortran expression REAL = REAL ** INTEGER*4

Dear all, During app compilation we have a crash in NVPTX backend: LLVM ERROR: Cannot select: 0x732b270: i64 = ExternalSymbol'__powisf2' [ID=18] As I understand LLVM tries to lower the following call %28 = call ptx_device float @llvm.powi.f32(float 2.000000e+00, i32 %8) nounwind readonly to device intrinsic. The table llvm/IntrinsicsNVVM.td does not contain such intrinsic, however it

When trying to display and do anything with a variable of type IntrinsicInst, gdb thinks that it's an incomplete type and kind find any member functions or even display the class. (gdb) list 1337 1332 1333 // Finish off the call including any return values. 1334 return finishCall(CLI, RetVT, NumBytes); 1335 } 1336 1337 bool MipsFastISel::fastLowerIntrinsicCall(const

Hi, I'm having trouble getting a logon script to work... I have created a DOS batch file (timesync.bat) and placed it in the scripts directory of the server. The file contains only one line - net time \\ptlserver /SET /y My smb.conf "Globals" section is:- [global] workgroup = PTLTRAIN netbios name = PTLSERVER server string = Llandrindod Trainee Server encrypt passwords = Yes

> On May 8, 2018, at 9:50 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > 1. The reassociate pass that exists right now was *originally* (AFAIK) written to enable CSE/GVN to do better. Agreed. The original mindset included a (naive) belief that going with a canonical form was better than teaching redundancy elimination to handle abstractions (as a matter

Hi, I have problems with sieve fileinto and polish characters in folder names: # rule:[??????????????????] elsif anyof (header :contains "Subject" "??????????????????") { fileinto "INBOX/&AQUBBwEZAUIBRADzAVsBegF8AQQBBgEYAUEBQwDTAVoBeQF7-"; } dovecot log: Apr 5 15:17:42 mailer dovecot: lmtp(54203, test at test1.com): rmHVJHabfU+70wAA9hAjDg: sieve:

Ok. I'm basically just following the model of the other fast-isel ports. On 01/30/2015 09:12 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > (I'm assuming you're building LLVM with clang, in this case?) > > Looks like IntrinsicInst is one of those "lies" in LLVM that works via > type punning that's undefined behavior in C++, so it's code that > should be fixed anyway.

Hi, I am afraid I have a question to ask of you all. I have just completed setting up a mail server running on Ubuntu Server 10.04. It has postfix, dovecot 1.2.19, LDAP and squirrelmail as the webmail. I have also created virtual users accounts on the system through LDAP. I can send and receive mails which is great. Now, what I am trying to do is to set up a vacation auto-reply on the

(I'm assuming you're building LLVM with clang, in this case?) Looks like IntrinsicInst is one of those "lies" in LLVM that works via type punning that's undefined behavior in C++, so it's code that should be fixed anyway. In any case, the reason this produces the debugging experience you're seeing is that LLVM (& GCC, for that matter) assumes that if your class

Hi Justin, gentlemen, I'm afraid I have to escalate this issue at this point. Since it was discussed for the first time last summer, it was sufficient for us for a while to have lowering of math calls into intrinsics disabled at DragonEgg level, and link them against CUDA math functions at LLVM IR level. Now I can say: this is not sufficient any longer, and we need NVPTX backend to deal with

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 10:37 PM, reed kotler <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > Ok. > > I'm basically just following the model of the other fast-isel ports. > Yeah, not your fault - just an architectural quirk. It's possible we could workaround the debug info side of this by declaring the virtual dtor (or some other virtual function - even an explicit anchor as we have

When you say that distribution shouldn't be used, do you mean within instcombine rather than some other pass? Or not all as an IR optimization? A dedicated optimization pass that looks for and makes factoring/distribution folds to eliminate instructions seems like it would solve the problems that I'm seeing. Ie, I'm leaning towards the proposal here: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41574

Hi, I have put entries into the "hosts" file for all the machines which need to connect to our Samba server. Everything seems to be working correctly but I'm curious.... can anyone tell me what the other files "hosts.deny" and "hosts.allow" are for. Thanks Mike