search for: powool

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "powool".

2018 Mar 06
1
SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:58 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Paul Anderson <pha at umich.edu> wrote: > >> Raghavendra, >> >> I've commited my tests case to https://github.com/powool/gluster.git - >> it's grungy, and a work in progress, but I am happy to take change >> suggestions, especially if it will save folks significant time. >> >> For the rest, I'll reply inline below... >> >> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Raghavendra Gowdap...
2018 Mar 06
2
SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?
Raghavendra, I've commited my tests case to https://github.com/powool/gluster.git - it's grungy, and a work in progress, but I am happy to take change suggestions, especially if it will save folks significant time. For the rest, I'll reply inline below... On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> wrote: > +Csaba...
2018 Mar 06
0
SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Paul Anderson <pha at umich.edu> wrote: > Raghavendra, > > I've commited my tests case to https://github.com/powool/gluster.git - > it's grungy, and a work in progress, but I am happy to take change > suggestions, especially if it will save folks significant time. > > For the rest, I'll reply inline below... > > On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 10:39 PM, Raghavendra Gowdappa > <rgowdapp at...
2018 Mar 06
0
SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?
+Csaba. On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Paul Anderson <pha at umich.edu> wrote: > Raghavendra, > > Thanks very much for your reply. > > I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the volume > performance.write-behind flag as you suggested, and simultaneously > disabling caching in my client side mount command. > Good to know it worked. Can you give us the
2018 Mar 05
6
SQLite3 on 3 node cluster FS?
Raghavendra, Thanks very much for your reply. I fixed our data corruption problem by disabling the volume performance.write-behind flag as you suggested, and simultaneously disabling caching in my client side mount command. In very modest testing, the flock() case appears to me to work well - before it would corrupt the db within a few transactions. Testing using built in sqlite3 locks is