search for: powi_f32

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "powi_f32".

2012 Dec 12
1
[LLVMdev] powi_f32
I'm trying to get clang/llvm soft float to generate a call to __powisf2 and __powidf2. How would you do this in C? these are mappings from RTLIB::POWI_F32, RTLIB::POWI_F64
2014 Sep 18
2
[LLVMdev] troubles with ISD::FPOWI
...---- This is coming out of DAGTypeLegalizer::ExpandIntegerResult(). I've tried adding some code to expand the integer operand (operand 1) via SIGN_EXTEND[_INREG] but keep getting other consistency errors. Another approach I tried was to set the calling convention: setLibcallCallingConv(RTLIB::POWI_F32, CallingConv::C); Which would seem to force the call to convert the i32 --> i64 just like any other call, but that did not work either Any suggestions (is this a real bug? - when I give other 64-bit targets, they also bomb out (sparcv9, aarch64) Regards, Richard Gorton Cognitive Electronics...
2009 May 21
0
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Dan Gohman <gohman at apple.com> wrote: > Can you explain why you chose the approach of using a new pass? > I pictured removing LegalizeDAG's type legalization code would > mostly consist of finding all the places that use TLI.getTypeAction > and just deleting code for handling its Expand and Promote. Are you > anticipating something more
2009 May 20
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
On May 20, 2009, at 1:34 PM, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Eli Friedman > <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Per subject, this patch adding an additional pass to handle vector >> >> operations; the idea is that this allows removing the code from >> >> LegalizeDAG that handles illegal types, which should be a significant
2009 May 21
2
[LLVMdev] [PATCH] Add new phase to legalization to handle vector operations
...T.isVector()) { - Result = LegalizeOp(UnrollVectorOp(Op)); - break; - } + assert(!VT.isVector() && "Vector should be already expanded!"); // We always lower FPOWI into a libcall. No target support for it yet. RTLIB::Libcall LC = GetFPLibCall(VT, RTLIB::POWI_F32, RTLIB::POWI_F64, @@ -3973,47 +3376,17 @@ break; } case ISD::BIT_CONVERT: - if (!isTypeLegal(Node->getOperand(0).getValueType())) { + switch (TLI.getOperationAction(ISD::BIT_CONVERT, + Node->getOperand(0).getValueType())) { + default: asse...