Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "powerpc32".
Did you mean:
powerpc
2010 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] powerpc32: llvm-2.8 make-check failures
On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:37 AM, acrux wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> here the failures. Anyway there is a suggested "revision" to use on
> PowerPC 32bit on Linux ?
>
Looks like you didn't build support for all targets in when you built it?
-eric
> [...]
> llvm[0]: ***** Completed Release Build
> + make check
>
2010 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] powerpc32: llvm-2.8 make-check failures
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
here the failures. Anyway there is a suggested "revision" to use on
PowerPC 32bit on Linux ?
[...]
llvm[0]: ***** Completed Release Build
+ make check
llvm[0]: Running test suite
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/work/src/llvm-2.8/test'
Making a new site.exp file...
Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file...
Making LLVM unittest
2011 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] Calling external functions failed on PowerPC
Hi, all
I found the example code examples/HowToUseJIT.cpp also shows
the same error.
Attachment is the LLVM module created by HowToUseJIT. And here
is the error,
Running foo: %X4<def> = LDtoc <ga:@add1>, %X2
UNREACHABLE executed!
Stack dump:
0. Running pass 'PowerPC Machine Code Emitter' on function '@foo'
Aborted
Currently, I use gdb try to track down
2014 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] llvm atomics on 64-bit values
I need an atomic pointer exchange, so I took a look at Support/Atomic.h,
and the only supported types are 32-bit values. I can't figure out an
obvious reason for this other than perhaps nobody ever had need of this
yet, but given that this is kind of a low level thing, I thought I should
ask first. Is there any reason I should not add 64-bit versions of the
atomic functions?
Additionally,
2011 Mar 23
4
[LLVMdev] Calling external functions failed on PowerPC
Hi, all
I have a trouble with calling external functions on PowerPC.
What I am doing is generating a LLVM IR first like this,
- x86
call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !12
- ppc
call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !10
After lowering above LLVM IR for x86 and ppc, it becomes:
- x86
%RAX<def> = MOV64ri
2014 Nov 26
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote:
> > From: Daniel Sanders
> > Sent: 25 November 2014 17:39
> > To: Eric Christopher; Tom Stellard
> > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu)
> > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
> >
> > > > > > I'd also like to propose the inclusion of
2014 Nov 29
17
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
...the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the FreeBSD 11.0 base system. Apologies in advance for the long list. :)
>
Hi Dimitry,
Can you cc the appropriate code owners to get their approval. It might
help to send a separate email per code owner.
Thanks,
Tom
>
> Enabling TLS support for PowerPC32:
>
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=213960&view=rev
>
> [PowerPC] Support TLS on PPC32/ELF
>
> Patch by Justin Hibbits!
>
>
> Two changes needed for being able to link lldb 3.5.x against llvm 3.5.x:
>
> http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-proj...