search for: powerpc32

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "powerpc32".

Did you mean: powerpc
2010 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] powerpc32: llvm-2.8 make-check failures
On Nov 13, 2010, at 9:37 AM, acrux wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > here the failures. Anyway there is a suggested "revision" to use on > PowerPC 32bit on Linux ? > Looks like you didn't build support for all targets in when you built it? -eric > [...] > llvm[0]: ***** Completed Release Build > + make check >
2010 Nov 13
2
[LLVMdev] powerpc32: llvm-2.8 make-check failures
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 here the failures. Anyway there is a suggested "revision" to use on PowerPC 32bit on Linux ? [...] llvm[0]: ***** Completed Release Build + make check llvm[0]: Running test suite make[1]: Entering directory `/home/llvm/work/src/llvm-2.8/test' Making a new site.exp file... Making LLVM 'lit.site.cfg' file... Making LLVM unittest
2011 Mar 25
0
[LLVMdev] Calling external functions failed on PowerPC
Hi, all I found the example code examples/HowToUseJIT.cpp also shows the same error. Attachment is the LLVM module created by HowToUseJIT. And here is the error, Running foo: %X4<def> = LDtoc <ga:@add1>, %X2 UNREACHABLE executed! Stack dump: 0. Running pass 'PowerPC Machine Code Emitter' on function '@foo' Aborted Currently, I use gdb try to track down
2014 Jun 03
2
[LLVMdev] llvm atomics on 64-bit values
I need an atomic pointer exchange, so I took a look at Support/Atomic.h, and the only supported types are 32-bit values. I can't figure out an obvious reason for this other than perhaps nobody ever had need of this yet, but given that this is kind of a low level thing, I thought I should ask first. Is there any reason I should not add 64-bit versions of the atomic functions? Additionally,
2011 Mar 23
4
[LLVMdev] Calling external functions failed on PowerPC
Hi, all I have a trouble with calling external functions on PowerPC. What I am doing is generating a LLVM IR first like this, - x86 call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !12 - ppc call void @helper_shack_flush(%struct.CPUX86State* %62) noinline, !flags !10 After lowering above LLVM IR for x86 and ppc, it becomes: - x86 %RAX<def> = MOV64ri
2014 Nov 26
6
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:15:13AM +0000, Daniel Sanders wrote: > > From: Daniel Sanders > > Sent: 25 November 2014 17:39 > > To: Eric Christopher; Tom Stellard > > Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu) > > Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1 > > > > > > > > I'd also like to propose the inclusion of
2014 Nov 29
17
[LLVMdev] Proposed patches for Clang 3.5.1
...the upcoming clang 3.5.0 import into the FreeBSD 11.0 base system. Apologies in advance for the long list. :) > Hi Dimitry, Can you cc the appropriate code owners to get their approval. It might help to send a separate email per code owner. Thanks, Tom > > Enabling TLS support for PowerPC32: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=213960&view=rev > > [PowerPC] Support TLS on PPC32/ELF > > Patch by Justin Hibbits! > > > Two changes needed for being able to link lldb 3.5.x against llvm 3.5.x: > > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-proj...