Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "powerlinux".
Did you mean:
powerline
2013 Jan 31
2
[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features
...ng are made available
to LLVM for inspection.
I'm sure there must be an obvious way to do this, but peeking at code
from other targets hasn't enlightened me. Any advice for how I can
accomplish this?
Thanks! I appreciate any help.
Bill
--
Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
IBM Linux Technology Center
wschmidt at us.ibm.com
wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
2013 Jan 31
2
[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features
...cessors that ought to be in there).
Thanks,
Bill
>
> Why this not done currently I don't know.
>
> -Hal
>
> >
> > Thanks! I appreciate any help.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > --
> > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> > wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > LLVM Developers mailing list
> > LLVMdev at cs....
2013 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features
...vec, true)) {
CmdArgs.push_back("-backend-option");
CmdArgs.push_back("-mattr=-altivec");
}
Why this not done currently I don't know.
-Hal
>
> Thanks! I appreciate any help.
>
> Bill
>
> --
> Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> IBM Linux Technology Center
> wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.c...
2013 Jan 31
2
[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features
...t; > >
> > > -Hal
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks! I appreciate any help.
> > > >
> > > > Bill
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> > > > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> > > > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > > > wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> > > > wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ___________...
2013 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features
...; > Why this not done currently I don't know.
> >
> > -Hal
> >
> > >
> > > Thanks! I appreciate any help.
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > --
> > > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> > > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> > > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > > wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> > > wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >...
2013 Jan 31
0
[LLVMdev] Getting command line options to affect subtarget features
...> >
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks! I appreciate any help.
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
> > > > > IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
> > > > > IBM Linux Technology Center
> > > > > wschmidt at us.ibm.com
> > > > > wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > &g...
2012 Aug 27
1
[LLVMdev] powerpc XFAIL question
...sed to be, and the final alignment generated for Clang and GCC is
identical.
Question: Does anyone know on what flavor of powerpc this is expected
to fail, and why? Or should I just remove powerpc from the XFAIL list
for this test?
Thanks,
Bill
--
Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
IBM Linux Technology Center
wschmidt at us.ibm.com
wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
2012 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] FileCheck for instructions of indeterminate order?
...say, the test is XFAILed until I can figure a way to test
this more safely.
All help appreciated!
Thanks,
Bill
N.B. I found the nondeterminacy at -O0 to be somewhat surprising...is
there some other option I need to avoid instruction reordering?
--
Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
IBM Linux Technology Center
wschmidt at us.ibm.com
wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
2012 Aug 31
1
[LLVMdev] Overriding TargetRegisterInfo::hasReservedSpillSlot
...ction &MF parameter is marked const also. It makes it
impossible to call MF.getFrameInfo() without casting the constness away.
In such cases, is it best to cast away const, or remove the qualifier
from the parameter?)
Thanks for any help!
Bill
--
Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
IBM Linux Technology Center
wschmidt at us.ibm.com
wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
2012 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] Scheduling question (memory dependency)
...CodeGen/SelectionDAG/SelectionDAGBuilder, using the PowerPC-specific
code in lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.cpp. The load is generated
directly from the "load" in the LLVM IR at some other time.)
Thanks very much for any help!
Bill
--
Bill Schmidt, Ph.D.
IBM Advance Toolchain for PowerLinux
IBM Linux Technology Center
wschmidt at us.ibm.com
wschmidt at linux.vnet.ibm.com
2012 Aug 16
1
[LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] [llvm] r162034 - /llvm/trunk/include/llvm/Object/ELF.h
I'm adding the dev list to this discussion, as it's a bit meta, and not
specific to these patches.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Will Schmidt <will_schmidt at vnet.ibm.com>wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 15:06 -0400, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> > On 16 August 2012 14:33, Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at google.com> wrote:
> > > Test cases?
> >
> >