search for: powerkvm

...l Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>>>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the >>>>>> rpm_is_avaiable verification >>>>>> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). >>>>> the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 >>>>> uses librpm to query for r...

...On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the >>>> rpm_is_avaiable verification >>>> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). >>> the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 >>> uses librpm to query for rpm dependencies, file listing, p...

The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the rpm_is_avaiable verification in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). Thanks and sorry for the confusion, Daniel -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: 0001-Adding-ibm-powerkvm-distro-detection.patch Type: text/...

...rote: >>>>> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: >>>>>> Hi Daniel, >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >>>>>>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the >>>>>>> rpm_is_avaiable verification >>>>>>> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). >>>>>> the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= >>>>>> 5.1.12 >>&...

Hi Pino, On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: >> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the >> rpm_is_avaiable verification >> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 > uses librpm to query for rpm dependencies, file listing, provides, etc. > If rpm_is_ava...

...09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >> On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > >>> Hi Daniel, > >>> > >>> On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >>>> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > >>>> rpm_is_avaiable verification > >>>> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > >>> the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 > >>> uses librpm to query for rpm dependenc...

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:09:55PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > Hi, > > I've found a problem with supermin code running in an ibm_powerkvm > ppc64le distro. > > Output of libguestfs-test-tool: > [...] > supermin: version: 5.1.10 [...] > supermin: ext2: populating from base image > supermin: ext2: copying files from host filesystem > supermin: open: /lib64/dbus-1/dbus-daemon-launch-helper: Permission denied &g...

Hi Daniel, On Thursday 02 April 2015 09:34:17 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > On 04/02/2015 05:23 AM, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > >> The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > >> rpm_is_avaiable verification > >> in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > > the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 > > uses librpm to query for rpm dependencies, file listing, provides, etc...

Hi, I've found a problem with supermin code running in an ibm_powerkvm ppc64le distro. Output of libguestfs-test-tool: $ libguestfs-test-tool ************************************************************ * IMPORTANT NOTICE * * When reporting bugs, include the COMPLETE, UNEDITED * output below in your bug report....

On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 04:37:26PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > rpm_is_avaiable verification > in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). > > Thanks and sorry for the confusion, Daniel, thanks - I have pushed an update which should fix everything. https://github.com/libguestfs/supermin/commit/b2b0f29efb537161...

Hi Daniel, On Wednesday 01 April 2015 16:37:26 Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote: > The one that got upstream does not work in ibm-powerkvm due to the > rpm_is_avaiable verification > in the detection (I've attached the wrong version in bugzilla). the new version of the patch is somehow confusing. supermin >= 5.1.12 uses librpm to query for rpm dependencies, file listing, provides, etc. If rpm_is_available returns false,...

Or even ... cat > /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/00-directories <<EOF /opt /opt/ibm /opt/ibm/powerkvm /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/pkvm /usr/share/doc/pkvm/licenses EOF -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test...

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:33:47PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > ?- For the above, can you show (or describe) where the qspinlock > ? ?improves things compared to our current locks. So currently PPC has a fairly straight forward test-and-set spinlock IIRC. You have this because LPAR/virt muck and lock holder preemption issues etc.. qspinlock is 1) a fair lock (like ticket locks)

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:33:47PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > ?- For the above, can you show (or describe) where the qspinlock > ? ?improves things compared to our current locks. So currently PPC has a fairly straight forward test-and-set spinlock IIRC. You have this because LPAR/virt muck and lock holder preemption issues etc.. qspinlock is 1) a fair lock (like ticket locks)

On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 10:26:54PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Or even ... > > cat > /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/00-directories <<EOF > /opt > /opt/ibm > /opt/ibm/powerkvm > /usr > /usr/share > /usr/share/doc > /usr/share/doc/pkvm > /usr/share/doc/pkvm/licenses > EOF Or another thing to try (if you don't care about /opt/ibm being added to the appliance) would be: cat > /usr/lib64/guestfs/supermin.d/00-ignore <<EOF -/opt/ibm EOF Rich....

..." in + fedora|rhel|centos) distro=redhat ;; + opensuse|sled|sles) distro=suse ;; + ubuntu) distro=debian ;; + esac +elif [ -f /etc/arch-release ]; then distro=arch elif [ -f /etc/debian_version ]; then distro=debian @@ -63,6 +70,10 @@ case $distro in ibm-powerkvm) pkgs="augeas hivex tar" ;; + *) + echo "Unhandled distro '$distro'" + exit 77 + ;; esac test "$USE_NETWORK" = 1 || USE_INSTALLED=--use-installed -- 2.7.4

Hi, let's make supermin use /etc/os-release as primary source instead of the various release files in /etc; apparently distros (e.g. openSUSE) are starting removing them. Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): Add simple handling of /etc/os-release Use os-release to detect the distro src/Makefile.am | 3 +++ src/dpkg.ml | 3 ++- src/os_release.ml | 78

Hi All, this is the fairlock patchset. You can apply them and build successfully. patches are based on linux-next qspinlock can avoid waiter starved issue. It has about the same speed in single-thread and it can be much faster in high contention situations especially when the spinlock is embedded within the data structure to be protected. v8 -> v9: mv qspinlocm config entry to

Hi All, this is the fairlock patchset. You can apply them and build successfully. patches are based on linux-next qspinlock can avoid waiter starved issue. It has about the same speed in single-thread and it can be much faster in high contention situations especially when the spinlock is embedded within the data structure to be protected. v8 -> v9: mv qspinlocm config entry to

Hi All, this is the fairlock patchset. You can apply them and build successfully. patches are based on linux-next qspinlock can avoid waiter starved issue. It has about the same speed in single-thread and it can be much faster in high contention situations especially when the spinlock is embedded within the data structure to be protected. v7 -> v8: add one patch to drop a function call