Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pow_ri".
Did you mean:
pow_ii
1998 Jan 06
2
pow_ii
...relocation error: symbol not found: pow_ii: referenced in .../dsefor.so
would disappear in R 0.6x, but it has not. I believe this is suppose to come
from the f2c lib, but I seem to need just a couple of routines:
nm -u dsefor.so
Undefined symbols from dsefor.so:
.umul
pow_dd
pow_ii
pow_ri
For my own purposes I could compile with fortran but that makes it much harder
for others to use the library. Can anyone suggest a good strategy so that the
whole library can be used easily?
Paul Gilbert
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel maili...
1997 Aug 21
0
R-alpha: f2c
...the past week, I assume most of the
necessary parts on this library have been distributed with R (but I
can't find them). I have been compiling the C version of my code,
generated with f2c on another machine, and almost everything seems to
be working. I am having trouble with pow_dd, pow_ii and pow_ri.
If there are truely only a few important routines missing then it would
be a lot easier for people distributing libraries to have those pieces
added to the R distribution.
Paul Gilbert
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
r-devel mailing list -- Read htt...
1997 Aug 28
1
R-alpha: pow_ii
>> I'm a bit confused about this discussion, but since I don't have f2c on
...
>A lot of Fortran code doesn't require any libf2c routines. When routines
>are needed the most common ones are the exponentiation routines pow_dd,
>pow_ii and pow_di (pow_ri is for single precision reals and so is less
>needed in R, which uses double precision). However, *some* fortran code,
...
Thomas
>From your previous response to my confusion I guessed I would be ok
with pow_ii, but that does not seem to be the case:
R
...
> dsecurve.function.tests(ve...