Displaying 20 results from an estimated 609 matches for "postpones".
Did you mean:
postponed
2014 Sep 17
7
[LLVMdev] Postponing more passes in LTO
Looking at the existing flow of passes for LTO, it appears that most all
passes are run on a per file basis, before the call to the gold linker. I'm
looking to get people's feedback on whether there would be an advantage to
waiting to run a number of these passes until the linking stage. For
example, I believe I saw a post a little while back about postponing
vectorization until the
2015 Apr 29
3
Postpone email delivery with LMTP and Postfix
Hi,
is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an
email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++)
for a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must
be delivered when account is unfrozen.
I found few things about Postfix filters, but I'm not sure it's a good way.
Thank you, Milo
2013 Nov 18
0
[LLVMdev] Cambridge LLVM Social - Postponed
Hi folks,
Due to the Cambridge LLVM Day being today, we're postponing the LLVM
Social. It'll initially be next week, but if enough people reply
negatively, we can postpone for two weeks from now.
Just let me know...
cheers,
--renato
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
2020 Apr 21
2
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if
the virtqueue has enough space.
If the virtqueue is full, the transmitting packet is queued up
and it will be sent in the next iteration. This causes the same
packet to be delivered multiple times to monitoring devices.
This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery
to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued
2020 Apr 21
2
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if
the virtqueue has enough space.
If the virtqueue is full, the transmitting packet is queued up
and it will be sent in the next iteration. This causes the same
packet to be delivered multiple times to monitoring devices.
This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery
to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued
2006 Feb 12
1
sshd double-logging
Hi all.
As Corinna pointed out, there are some cases where sshd will log some
authentications twice when privsep=yes.
This can happen on any platform although it seems most obvious on the
ones that don't do post-auth privsep. It also occurs when sshd logs
to stderr (eg running under daemontools) or when you have a /dev/log in
the privsep chroot.
The patch below attempts to solve this for
2020 Apr 21
0
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if
> the virtqueue has enough space.
"We [are] delivering packets" and "before to check" -> "before
checking". Perhaps it can be rewritten as:
Packets are delivered to monitoring devices before checking if the
virtqueue has
2020 Apr 22
0
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if
> > > the virtqueue has enough space.
> >
> > "We [are] delivering
2015 Apr 30
0
Postpone email delivery with LMTP and Postfix
* Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> 2015.04.29 22:47:
> is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an
> email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for
> a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be
> delivered when account is unfrozen.
You can put the messages on hold and then release them
2020 Apr 21
2
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if
> > the virtqueue has enough space.
>
> "We [are] delivering packets" and "before to check" -> "before
> checking". Perhaps it can be
2020 Apr 21
2
[PATCH net] vsock/virtio: postpone packet delivery to monitoring devices
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if
> > the virtqueue has enough space.
>
> "We [are] delivering packets" and "before to check" -> "before
> checking". Perhaps it can be
2014 Dec 18
5
[LLVMdev] Postponing more passes in LTO
In the future could you please do some sort of visualization of your data,
or at least provide the raw data in a machine-readable format so that
others can do so?
It is incredibly easy to come to incorrect conclusions when looking at
lists of numbers because at any given moment you have a very localized view
of the dataset and are prone to locally pattern-match and form a selection
bias that
2006 Jun 20
2
Postpone/avoid swaping while there is still free RAM.
Hi people,
I got Centos 4.3 on a 1GB Pentium IV machine. The output of free
-------------------
$ free
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1026896 573848 453048 0 2988 131712
-/+ buffers/cache: 439148 587748
Swap: 1052248 137568 914680
------------------
There is plenty of free ram, but the kernel
2011 Mar 25
4
updating without rebooting
Hi all,
I'm curious. If I do yum update (which include kernel update) but don't reboot.
Is it OK? I mean apart of the kernel, other things like services, we
don't have to reboot if we don't have the chance to do it (postponing
to some other date), right?
Thank you.
2014 Jun 16
1
SIGSEGV in 2.2.13 with IMAP Proxying to an Exchange Server
100% reproducible. User is using alpine to write an email.
Continue postponed composition (answering "No" won't erase it)?
y -> [>Empty folder! No messages really postponed!<]
Can't delete {mproxy.charite.de/ssl/novalidate-cert/user=theusername}postponed-msgs
Setup:
======
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapcProxy
coredump available for further inspection
Full
2020 Mar 16
2
Upstreaming Flang - postponed to Monday 23rd March
Hi llvm-dev
We have not been able to complete all the work we need to do before merging F18 into LLVM as Flang so we will not be dong that today as previously announced.
We propose to slip this back a week to let us finish off the last bits of work. All code changes are in review as of Friday. If you want more detail, you can see the exact status here:
2010 Feb 27
3
Oniguruma and Ultraviolet on Windows 7
Hi I have been tying to install the followings gems in order to add
code syntax highlighting to my application:
-Oniguruma
-Ultraviolet
-Harsh
Unfortunately I have been running into the the following errors when
running "gem install oniguruma ultraviolet"
Building native extensions. This could take a while...
ERROR: Error installing oniguruma:
ERROR: Failed to build gem
2001 Oct 10
1
ordered data
Hi,
I have a detailed question about ordered data writes.
Suppose we (i.e. intermezzo) does a transaction, which is closed and
then followed by an ordered write. Let's assume the ordered write
doesn't require new allocation metadata.
Is the write still postponed until the first transaction has
committed?
As far as I can see, prepare_write always starts a transaction, but
I'm
2015 Nov 21
2
[lld] R_MIPS_HI16 / R_MIPS_LO16 calculation
Hi,
I am working on support R_MIPS_HI16 / R_MIPS_LO16 in the new LLD and
have a couple of questions.
== Q1
In case of MIPS O32 ABI we have to find a matching R_MIPS_LO16
relocation to calculate R_MIPS_HI16 one because R_MIPS_HI16 uses
combined addend (AHI << 16) + (short)ALO where AHI is original
R_MIPS_HI16 addend and ALO is addend of the matching R_MIPS_LO16
relocation [1]. There are two
2016 Oct 14
4
Dovecot does not close connections
Hello,
I am running into this error:
/Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded
(mail_max_userip_connections=10)/
The suggested solution in hundreds of support requests on this mailing
list and throughout the internet is to increase the number of maximum
userip connections. But this is not curing the problem, it is just
postponing it to the moment when the new limit is reached.
When i