search for: postponement

Looking at the existing flow of passes for LTO, it appears that most all passes are run on a per file basis, before the call to the gold linker. I'm looking to get people's feedback on whether there would be an advantage to waiting to run a number of these passes until the linking stage. For example, I believe I saw a post a little while back about postponing vectorization until the

Hi, is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be delivered when account is unfrozen. I found few things about Postfix filters, but I'm not sure it's a good way. Thank you, Milo

Hi folks, Due to the Cambridge LLVM Day being today, we're postponing the LLVM Social. It'll initially be next week, but if enough people reply negatively, we can postpone for two weeks from now. Just let me know... cheers, --renato -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if the virtqueue has enough space. If the virtqueue is full, the transmitting packet is queued up and it will be sent in the next iteration. This causes the same packet to be delivered multiple times to monitoring devices. This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued

We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if the virtqueue has enough space. If the virtqueue is full, the transmitting packet is queued up and it will be sent in the next iteration. This causes the same packet to be delivered multiple times to monitoring devices. This patch fixes this issue, postponing the packet delivery to monitoring devices, only when it is properly queued

Hi all. As Corinna pointed out, there are some cases where sshd will log some authentications twice when privsep=yes. This can happen on any platform although it seems most obvious on the ones that don't do post-auth privsep. It also occurs when sshd logs to stderr (eg running under daemontools) or when you have a /dev/log in the privsep chroot. The patch below attempts to solve this for

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if > the virtqueue has enough space. "We [are] delivering packets" and "before to check" -> "before checking". Perhaps it can be rewritten as: Packets are delivered to monitoring devices before checking if the virtqueue has

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:17:24PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > > We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if > > > the virtqueue has enough space. > > > > "We [are] delivering

* Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> 2015.04.29 22:47: > is there any way, based on userdb/passwdb attribute, how to postpone an > email delivery? The purpose is, I need to freeze an account (Maildir++) for > a few minutes and new email must not be delivered. But emails must be > delivered when account is unfrozen. You can put the messages on hold and then release them

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if > > the virtqueue has enough space. > > "We [are] delivering packets" and "before to check" -> "before > checking". Perhaps it can be

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:42:46PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:25:27AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > > We delivering packets to monitoring devices, before to check if > > the virtqueue has enough space. > > "We [are] delivering packets" and "before to check" -> "before > checking". Perhaps it can be

In the future could you please do some sort of visualization of your data, or at least provide the raw data in a machine-readable format so that others can do so? It is incredibly easy to come to incorrect conclusions when looking at lists of numbers because at any given moment you have a very localized view of the dataset and are prone to locally pattern-match and form a selection bias that

Hi people, I got Centos 4.3 on a 1GB Pentium IV machine. The output of free ------------------- $ free total used free shared buffers cached Mem: 1026896 573848 453048 0 2988 131712 -/+ buffers/cache: 439148 587748 Swap: 1052248 137568 914680 ------------------ There is plenty of free ram, but the kernel

Hi all, I'm curious. If I do yum update (which include kernel update) but don't reboot. Is it OK? I mean apart of the kernel, other things like services, we don't have to reboot if we don't have the chance to do it (postponing to some other date), right? Thank you.

100% reproducible. User is using alpine to write an email. Continue postponed composition (answering "No" won't erase it)? y -> [>Empty folder! No messages really postponed!<] Can't delete {mproxy.charite.de/ssl/novalidate-cert/user=theusername}postponed-msgs Setup: ====== http://wiki2.dovecot.org/HowTo/ImapcProxy coredump available for further inspection Full

Hi llvm-dev We have not been able to complete all the work we need to do before merging F18 into LLVM as Flang so we will not be dong that today as previously announced. We propose to slip this back a week to let us finish off the last bits of work. All code changes are in review as of Friday. If you want more detail, you can see the exact status here:

Hi I have been tying to install the followings gems in order to add code syntax highlighting to my application: -Oniguruma -Ultraviolet -Harsh Unfortunately I have been running into the the following errors when running "gem install oniguruma ultraviolet" Building native extensions. This could take a while... ERROR: Error installing oniguruma: ERROR: Failed to build gem

Hi, I have a detailed question about ordered data writes. Suppose we (i.e. intermezzo) does a transaction, which is closed and then followed by an ordered write. Let's assume the ordered write doesn't require new allocation metadata. Is the write still postponed until the first transaction has committed? As far as I can see, prepare_write always starts a transaction, but I'm

Hi, I am working on support R_MIPS_HI16 / R_MIPS_LO16 in the new LLD and have a couple of questions. == Q1 In case of MIPS O32 ABI we have to find a matching R_MIPS_LO16 relocation to calculate R_MIPS_HI16 one because R_MIPS_HI16 uses combined addend (AHI << 16) + (short)ALO where AHI is original R_MIPS_HI16 addend and ALO is addend of the matching R_MIPS_LO16 relocation [1]. There are two

Hello, I am running into this error: /Maximum number of connections from user+IP exceeded (mail_max_userip_connections=10)/ The suggested solution in hundreds of support requests on this mailing list and throughout the internet is to increase the number of maximum userip connections. But this is not curing the problem, it is just postponing it to the moment when the new limit is reached. When i