search for: postix

...AD! ( not the POSIX ) Now go set the share rights from withing windows. then set the rights on the folder from within windows. if this does not work, i'll eat my shoe... and for these: admin users = +"TESTDomain Admins" profile acls = yes csc policy = disable You dont need postix settings on the profiles share imo. Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: bob at donelsontrophy.net >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Bob of Donelson Trophy >Verzonden: vrijdag 6 maart 2015 20:41 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba...

...of hard to do right. You'd have to keep the > known-good senders in sync across the receivers. But my bigger worry > would be a dictionary-type attack on user names as recipients if you > don't have access to the real user list on the secondary. With standard backup MX based on postix (with rather trivial configuration) you always do have list of legitimate recipients of primary MX on the secondary MX. Sorry if my previous e-mail is not explicit enough about it. It's a work, however, to maintain that table on backup MX (so your backup MX does accept mail for newly added user...

I was wondering whether there is a roadmap for adding SMTPUTF8 support to Dovecot? My delivery pattern is Postfix -> Dovecot LMTP and it is choking on utf8 messages. I might be able to volunteer some of my time as a developer. Another thread about this seemed to go unanswered: http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2016-September/105474.html

On 06.09.2018 22:25, kadafax at gmail.com wrote: > I necro-bump this thread as I have the same problem since I switched to LMTP from LDA (as the wiki recommend). > Any news to make dovecot LMTP postix compliant ? > > > Le 08/11/2016 ? 17:13, Noah Tilton a ?crit?: >> >> I was wondering whether there is a roadmap for adding SMTPUTF8 support to Dovecot? >> >> My delivery pattern is Postfix -> Dovecot LMTP and it is choking on utf8 messages. >> >> I...

yes, i know.. but its better if he try the new settings, it save to need of any GID for the group rights. im working on that also to make it more uniform and a set with posix and a set without postix rights. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com >[mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny >Verzonden: maandag 9 maart 2015 12:19 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] setting up W7 profi...

Hi All!!! I'm configure mail server with Postix+Mysql+Dovecot. How can I'm using to work sieve plugins? My dovecot.conf /protocol lda { mail_plugin_dir = /usr/lib/dovecot/lda #sendmail_path = /usr/sbin/postfix #auth_socket_path = /var/run/dovecot/auth-master mail_plugins = cmusieve #global_script_path = /etc/sieve.conf } plugin { sieve = /et...

...;Everyone deserves an award!!" On 2015-03-09 06:32, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > yes, i know.. > > but its better if he try the new settings, it save to need of any GID for the group rights. > im working on that also to make it more uniform and a set with posix and a set without postix rights. > > Greetz, > > Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny Verzonden: maandag 9 maart 2015 12:19 Aan: samba at lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] setting up W7 profiles On...

On 01/12/14 17:16, steve wrote: > On 01/12/14 18:11, Rowland Penny wrote: >> On 01/12/14 17:09, steve wrote: >>> On 01/12/14 17:31, Greg Zartman wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Rowland Penny >>>> <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I do what windows does,

...;Everyone deserves an award!!" > > On 2015-03-09 06:32, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > >> yes, i know.. but its better if he try the new settings, it save to need of any GID for the group rights. im working on that also to make it more uniform and a set with posix and a set without postix rights. Greetz, Louis -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: rowlandpenny at googlemail.com [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Rowland Penny Verzonden: maandag 9 maart 2015 12:19 Aan: samba at lists.samba.org Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] setting up W7 profiles On 09/03/15 10:59, L.P.H. van B...

...rname.internal.domain.tld\users2\%username% is used in my AD for the home folder of the users. %username% translates to the username. I tried 2 setups now, windows acl base setup and posix based setup. Both fail for me. THE SERVER with the shares ( and is nfs server) The samba/windows part. ( postix rights setup ) On the server this is /home/samba/users2 Users is shared, owner root , Group root, everyone. These have all "special" rights, with "only this folder" ls -al gives : drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Sep 7 10:18 users2 # file: home/samba/users2 # owner: root # gr...

Hi, I have a working installation of Postfix and Dovecot that works nicely. I've added SpamAssassin, which does a good job of flagging spam. Now I wanted to add greylisting to my server. Here's what I did. $ sudo yum install postgrey Increase the greylisting delay. # /etc/sysconfig/postgrey POSTGREY_OPTS="--delay=300" Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf accordingly.

Hi, On a samba 4.9.4 fileserver using ad backend with rfc2307  , when i create a file from a Win10 client, it s always created with the rights user:"domain users". I ve understood that with "unix_primary_group = yes" , the file should be created with the rights user:gidNumber . Here is my config : [global]        security = ADS        workgroup = SAMBA494        realm =

...You'd have to keep the >> known-good senders in sync across the receivers. But my bigger worry >> would be a dictionary-type attack on user names as recipients if you >> don't have access to the real user list on the secondary. > > With standard backup MX based on postix (with rather trivial > configuration) you always do have list of legitimate recipients of primary > MX on the secondary MX. Doing greylisting right means you also have to keep the table of already-known senders up to date and that may be very dynamic. -- Les Mikesell lesmikesell at...

...to send mails > from various mail servers to this machine. Everything gets delivered > immediately, and there's no greylisting action in /var/log/maillog. Did you include this line: postgrey unix - n n - - /var/spool/postfix/postgrey/socket in your /etc/postix/master.cf file? -- Mike Burger http://www.bubbanfriends.org "It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever just stops by to say 'hi' anymore." --Colonel Jack O'Neill, SG1

Hello, just setting up mail hub with Postfix & Dovecot I have found BUG in LMTP implementation. * assumptions - latest stable Postix & Dovecot, - Postfix delivers via Dovecot LMTP (virtual_transport = lmtp:127.0.0.1:24), - Dovecot userdb & passwd lookups are made via custom checkpassword interface, - each user (email account) has different UID/GID * description LMTP process must run as root to be able to deliver msgs...

I necro-bump this thread as I have the same problem since I switched to LMTP from LDA (as the wiki recommend). Any news to make dovecot LMTP postix compliant ? Le 08/11/2016 ? 17:13, Noah Tilton a ?crit?: > > I was wondering whether there is a roadmap for adding SMTPUTF8 support > to Dovecot? > > My delivery pattern is Postfix -> Dovecot LMTP and it is choking on > utf8 messages. > > I might be able to volunteer...

Cyrus has to be added to master.cf and transport_maps has to be set to "cyrus:localhost". So my question is how do I get the mails from postfix to dovecot? Hope it's okay to submit these type of questions here :) Thanks -- Tom Sommer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 194 bytes

We use Cyrus-imapd together with Postix to effect final delivery of email messages to our clients. The final delivery server is isolated from the internet via a firewall and only pre-authorized host addresses can connect. All user pickup and delivery email traffic is handled through separate Internet accessible hosts that may establish...

...sk::rwx > default:other::r-x > > What am i missing ? Nope, its exact as you have setup. Your mistake ( not really a misstake but more a misconfiguration / thought..) Here your checking the "Windows" acls. root at mom11:/home/d/dare# getfacl test_win10_v1/ Here your forcing POSTIX acl's. >     force create mode = 0755 >     force directory mode = 0755 The above force settings should be removed. Is this a "userhome dir" or "profiles folder" Because these needs a bit different rights, .. Depening on you needs.. My suggestion, re-read. ht...

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1008 Summary: GSSAPI authentication failes with Round Robin DNS hosts Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Kerberos support AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org