search for: postini

I have a mail server that handles several domains. One of these domains has decided to use Postini. For those not familiar with Postini, you set your MX records to use their mail servers. They filter mail, and deliver you only the clean virus/spam free mail. The idea is to only allow incoming mail from their mail servers so spammers are unable to send to your mail server directly. This is fa...

Any ideas? This one would make the 10th email received. Return-Path: <centos-bounces at centos.org> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx192.postini.com [64.18.3.171]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id p2LKkur4025229 for <jpyeron at pdinc.us>; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:46:57 -0400 Received: from source ([72.26.200.202]) by exprod8mx192.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Mon, 21 Mar 2011 16:46:31 EDT Received: from m...

...h SMTP; 29 Jun 2007 13:38:37 -0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=INXS.digium.internal) by lists.digium.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com>) id 1I2zQW-0004ty-N8; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:01:04 -0500 Received: from exprod8mx64.postini.com ([64.18.3.164] helo=psmtp.com) by lists.digium.com with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <g7ltt at g7ltt.com>) id 1I2zQL-0004tU-PU for asterisk-users at lists.digium.com; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:00:54 -0500 As you can see, the message was posted on June 25th and was sent to my email...

Is it just me? After the mail list server upgrade, the average delivery time for messages to the users list is between 4 and 5 days. The Dev list seems fine! Doug -- Ben Franklin quote: "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."

...005 19:33:42 -0000 Received: from [69.16.138.164] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33BDF2FF58A; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:23:36 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx31.postini.com [64.18.0.186]) by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2B1D12FE2D7 for <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:40:01 -0500 (CDT) Received: from source ([64.202.165.193]) by exprod5mx31.postini.com ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:40:07 CDT Received: (qmail 3...

...dovecot to deliver over nfs I have been examing our entire setup and had the thought, would it be recommended to instead have another exim process running directly on the raid server and have my mail servers deliver mail to that rather than over nfs, if that makes sense? So mail would go from our postini frontend => mail cluster => final delivery via exim on raid server. Seems like this way I could make all the nfs config options go away and such. Thoughts?

...> in it instead of an email addres (ie. MAILER-DAEMON@domain.com). The list was nailed with over 13,000 bounce messages(and they keep coming) from ONE list subscriber and I wasn't sure if their smtp server wasn't doing what it should. I finally had to just block their domain totally at postini to stop the flood of messages. I think this was part of the first slowdown and why the list slowed down again today. bkw

how to adjust voice volume for sipura 2000 and cisco ata186?

...when our server received an email it would slap the rcpt to in the received headers by adding a for <...> any ideas what has changed? Any pointers would be grateful. Headers received today: Return-Path: <xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from psmtp.com (exprod8mx220.postini.com [64.18.3.120]) by mail.pdinc.us (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with SMTP id m7CCwh6o006066; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 08:58:44 -0400 Received: from source ([198.185.182.20]) (using TLSv1) by exprod8mx220.postini.com ([64.18.7.10]) with SMTP; Tue, 12 Aug 2008 05:58:42 PDT Received: from hq-exout01.anteon....

Hi guys, This should be has an easy answer for you, my users are complaining that when they press # and then ear gorgeous Allison "Transfer" the timeout is very small, they must enter immediatly the extension to transfer the call. Is it possible to change this? ;transferdigittimeout => 3 ; Number of seconds to wait between digits when transfering a call This is timeout

On Friday, June 10, 2005 3:16 AM, Andrew Kohlsmith [SMTP:akohlsmith-asterisk@benshaw.com] wrote: > On Friday 10 June 2005 04:08, Terry H. Gilsenan wrote: > > Received: from source ([81.56.129.44]) by exprod5mx8.postini.com > > ([64.18.4.10]) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:29:16 PDT > > > > Your MTA claimed it was called "SOURCE" but rDNS tells the recipient MX > > that it is called: "mail.linuxautrement.com" > > I too will block emails with a non-FQDN HELO or EHL...

...for chobbs@silvervalley.k12.ca.us; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 07:33:09 -0700 Received: from digium.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77F4243347; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:27:21 -0500 (CDT) Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx116.postini.com [12.158.34.88]) by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F441242E1C for <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:26:05 -0500 (CDT) Received: from source ([148.223.46.34]) by exprod5mx116.postini.com ([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:18:58 EDT Received: f...

Hi, I have this setup: (PSTN E1 PRI) -- Asterisk -- (crosscable) -- Alcatel PBX --- analog phones and a few of VoIP phones directly connected to Asterisk. Calling a number (only one until now!) - an automatic responder (IVR) - from VoIP phones works, from analog phones doesn't work: NOANSWER after a few seconds. I'm using no 'r' in dial options (this caused a problem with an IVR

My SIP seems to be configured correctly as I can dial out and my minutes show up on my broadvoice bill, but whenever anyone calls my broadvoice # inbound they just get a busy signal. I dont get anything in the logs saying anything came in from broadvoice at all. Has anyone had this/simmilar problem with inbound from Broadvoice? Any suggestions? Thanks Neri -------------- next part

...NewLineFromSocket: for <km at mathcs.emory.edu>; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:37:04 -0400 (EDT) -1675625616[8e59a5b0]: ReadNextLine [stream=8e5049c8 nb=73 needmore=0] -1675625616[8e59a5b0]: 9023c800:mailhost.mathcs.emory.edu:S-INBOX:CreateNewLineFromSocket: Received: from psmtp.com (na3sys009amx258.postini.com [74.125.149.142]) -1675625616[8e59a5b0]: ReadNextLine [stream=8e5049c8 nb=66 needmore=0] -1675625616[8e59a5b0]: 9023c800:mailhost.mathcs.emory.edu:S-INBOX:CreateNewLineFromSocket: by mr5.cc.emory.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with SMTP id p6IMap3E019495 -1675625616[8e59a5b0]: ReadNextLine [stream=8e504...

Hello, I have a 4 port FXO digium card with 3 PSTNs attached to it and AsteriskAtHome setup. Everything is working fine except outbound calls. When I dial a outside number, it works fine, but when another employee trys to dial out while I am on a line, it will not go. I have a outgoing route setup in the AMP interface. Dial Pattern: 1NXXNXXXXXX NXXNXXXXXX NXXXXXX Trunk

Wow. My message made it to the list after more than 3 hours. Philipp -- amooma GmbH - Bachstr. 126 - 56566 Neuwied - http://www.amooma.de Let's use IT to solve problems and not to create new ones. Asterisk? -> http://www.das-asterisk-buch.de Gesch?ftsf?hrer: Stefan Wintermeyer Handelsregister: Neuwied B 14998

...0 Received: from [69.16.138.164] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02F492FE11F; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:05:06 -0500 (CDT) X-Original-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Delivered-To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Received: from psmtp.com (exprod5mx117.postini.com [12.158.34.89]) by lists.digium.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DBD9A2FD8A2 for <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com>; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 05:05:02 -0500 (CDT) Received: from source ([80.242.32.2]) by exprod5mx117.postini.com ([12.158.34.245]) with SMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 20...

We have tried Asterisk 1.0.9 on FC4 and have never been able to get CAPI (with Fritz card, fcpci) to work properly. Apart from that Asterisk works fine in switching internal calls. But it's useless if we can't make outgoing calls on our ISDN line. We are considering abandoning FC4 for Debian or SuSe. What is the general concensus on the best Linux to run Asterisk with CAPI? /Why Tea

Say I have agents using a softphone like eyebeam that has 6 lines. They log in to the queue. Say there are 3 agents in my queue. 3 calls come in and all three agents are on a call. Now a fourth call comes in. Is it possible to have it setup so that the 4 call rings on line 2 of one of my agents, if they don't get it within the time limit it rings on line 2 of another agent and so on. An