search for: postel

...y situation is h323gw - gatekeeper - asterisk - SIP client my problem is, that I can't make call from h323gw, when this GW is Micronet (sp5004). A ----------- CUT ----------- -- Executing Wait("H323/ip$62.152.225.18:52434/20702", "1") in new stack == Spawn extension (postel, 169, 1) exited non-zero on 'H323/ip$62.152.225.18:52434/20702' ----------- CUT ----------- On the other side, when the h232gw is Cisco ATA186, Cisco 7905 or Cisco AS5300 all is working good. I'm using standart h323 modul, which is included in the *. OH323 modul allways crashes. I...

...es, or respectively in the configuration of ata and snom ? If there is any good documention available, send me URL too. All (ata, snom) are behind firewall (nat) and astrix is on the public IP, but I can move for testing end point to the public IP. best regards Peter Hudec -- mail: [phudec@postel.sk] www: [http://www.postel.sk] phone: [+421 2 50203163] icq: [99518783] gpg: [http://hudecof.net/data/hudecof.gpg]

...e private network behind the same FW/NAT. All is working good, but whan I tried to establish call between these two UAs, first 10-15 second is nothing to hear and then is the quality terrible :( Can anyone tell how to get it work with normal quality ? best regards hudecof -- mail: [phudec@postel.sk] www: [http://www.postel.sk] cellular: [+421 02 50203166] icq: [99518783] gpg: [http://hudecof.net/data/hudecof.gpg]

...o another endpoing go through *, because of mixed SIP and H323 sihnalization. If the UA does not known G729 (known GSM, G711), which codec wil be used between * and AS5300 ? Will * translate GSM codec (or other) to the G729. If yes, how to get it work? best regards hudecof -- mail: [phudec@postel.sk] www: [http://www.postel.sk] cellular: [+421 02 50203166] icq: [99518783] gpg: [http://hudecof.net/data/hudecof.gpg]

...39;m talking with some one a I want to tramnfer call to the another extension, to the other person. 2) how can I make call confernece. Not Meetme If I'm talking with some one and I want to join another person to our talk . I haven't found this in any manual :( hudecof -- mail: [phudec@postel.sk] www: [http://www.postel.sk] cellular: [+421 02 50203166] icq: [99518783] gpg: [http://hudecof.net/data/hudecof.gpg]

Hello all, I''ve been trying to test HTB performance for different link bandwidths to find potential limits and this is what I have so far: http://home.comcast.net/~msethuraman/htbtest/ Can members please go over the setup, test procedure and the results and answer a few questions? 1. Is the testing methodology okay and can the results be considered accurate? If so, is this a decent

...er mark) between "First" >> and "Last" :) >> >> Since that is passed as the -f parameter to dovecot-lda, it was giving >> the 64 error. > > Your MTA should not be passing this along. Unfortunately Postfix does. It honors the robustness principle (~Postel's law) and therefore accepts envelope senders like from=<<U+FEFF>JamesBrown at triolan.net> or from=<Gerald<U+FEFF>Smith at nampaichuanlondon.com> or from=<Peter???Smith at taotalk.nl> (invalid 3-byte UTF-8 .) which are increasingly making rounds. With a working...

...e protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src 192.168.105.237   match ip dport 20001 0xffff flowid 1:11 ========================================================================= PC2:   IP: 192.168.105.211   Mask: 255.255.255.0   OS: Red Hat Linux Kernel 2.4.20-8 I''m using the TG (www.postel.org/tg) as a TCP traffic generator, to establish three 90kbits/s TCP flows from PC1(any port) to PC2(port 20000, 20001 and 20002), with different durations and pause times, which as can be shown in the next files: =========================================================================   on 0:2 t...

...+------------------+-----------------------+ Misael Happy Agus | <zen at tk-pttuntex dot com> | | +------------------+-----------------------+ "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send."-- Postel

...to get the breakfast rolls from the other side of the street. Most of my custemers will stayx with isc-dhcp (as log as it is possible) because kea is to complex and to overloaded. Am 01.11.23 um 18:30 schrieb Owen DeLong via samba: Well, I have a slightly different opinion. 1. I?ll channel Jon Postel here a little bit ? Networks and Systems should be as simple as possible and no simpler? IMHO, DNSMASQ is too simple for most of the DHCP environments I deal with and I find its structure frustrating at best. 2. Yes, KEA seems over complex when you first approach it. Mainly, that?s because there?s...

I noticed a mail stuck in my mail queue. dovecot-lda was returning error 64 Invalid parameter given. (EX_USAGE). Weird, weird, weird. After some sleuthing, I found the sender address was FirstLast at domain.tld, with a UTF8-encoded Unicode U+FEFF ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE character (AKA byte order mark) between "First" and "Last" :) Since that is passed as the -f parameter to

Hello, I'm new in ext3. I installed RH7.2 with ext3. For a short time it worked properly, but when I compiled the linux kernel (2.4.9-13) from RH package, the old kernel didn't boot again (I didn't change anything with the old binary). I downloaded kernel 2.4.14 and ext3 patch for this version. After the compilation and installation I rebooted the system. I got answer something

...ou probably don't want it binding to random wifi hotspots wherever you may go with it. If you're running a Real Server, then silently ignoring real problems is pretty much the opposite of what you'd want happening in most cases. The lessons of: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-00 aren't entirely inapplicable here. > IMHO "we don't do it right because it might paper over other problems" > is a poor reason for not patching. ("I don't need seatbelt or a helmet > because if my head gets hurt there is a different problem.")...

...on a second on all these nasty, disgusting "question mark in a rectangle" characters your users will see when you truncate their text improperly - this is, after all, the temple of Output, the browser domain - you sent it out, and then the browser has to cope with it according to Postel''s law. And besides there are not many of them, right? Just some lousy 5,5 billions of potential customers, right? Uhm, sorry, got a little offtopic here. Let''s move somewhat up the stack in my previous message, into a different domain - the one you care about. The one you f...

Hello Ron, On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 04:08:49PM +1030, Ron via Syslinux wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:09:43PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > > AI_CANONNAME is only relevant when the resulting official name is used, > > which is not the case in tftpd for the address to bind to. Also > > AI_ADDRCONFIG isn't helpful. This flag is good for sockets used to > >

...'t make the situation worse here. So lets agree that there are some situations where the patch is good, and in all other situations it doesn't hurt. That's a good enough justification to apply the patch if you ask me. > The lessons of: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-thomson-postel-was-wrong-00 > aren't entirely inapplicable here. I admit I didn't read that completely. The abstract says that the statement "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" might have negative consequences to long term maintenance. This might be true if you...

...; Additional Information: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ [1] Vixie P. , "DNS and BIND security issues". This was originally published in the proceedings of the 5th USENIX Security Symposium and its included in the BIND distribution under the doc/misc directory. [2] Kumar A., Postel J., Neuman C., Danzig P. , Miller S. "RFC1536: Common DNS implementation errors and suggested fixes" Refer to problem 2 for a description of other weaknesses previously found in the recursion scheme. [3] Lottor, M., "RFC1033: Domain administrators operations guide"...

Hello, I use HTB on IMQ, and I would like to use pfifo_fast on my HTB leafs. Do I need to add a pfifo_fast qdisc to my HTB class, or this is the default one? I tryed to add and I got: RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument It looks like pfifo_fast qdisc is not supported on HTB leaf... Any comments? Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list /

Hello, I have HTB on IMQ device. My rate does not work as I configured. I configured 1920kbit/s and I can download only about 290kbit/s (while it should be the whole bandwidth). My script: /sbin/modprobe imq numdevs=1 /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 root 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /usr/local/sbin/tc qdisc del dev imq0 ingress 2> /dev/null > /dev/null /sbin/ifconfig imq0 down

Hello, I use HTB with linux-2.4.20-ac1 and iptables-1.2.7a (pathced for IMQ). I configured one HTB qdisc on an IMQ device. This qdisc has some classes (about 5) and all of the classes has qdisc pfifo. I sometimes got out from my linux (while I was working) and I found in logs: Dec 4 11:49:27 core kernel: HTB init, kernel part version 3.7 Dec 4 11:49:28 core kernel: HTB: quantum of class