search for: postboxes

Hello! Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) --------------------------------------------------------------- managesieve_notify_capability = mailto managesieve_sieve_capability = fileinto reject envelope

Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >> Hello! >> > We're looking into it. Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce it when I replicate your setup. Regards, Stephan. >> Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) >> Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) >> >> After the update to pigeonhole

Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: > Hello! > We're looking into it. Regards, Stephan. > Dovecot 2.2.34 (874deae) > Pigeonhole version 0.4.22 (22940fb7) > > After the update to pigeonhole version 0.4.22 the following > configuration does not work. With version 0.4.21 it works. > > dovecot.conf (only sieve configuration) >

Op 3/3/2018 om 9:35 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: > Op 3/3/2018 om 9:15 AM schreef Stephan Bosch: >> Op 3/3/2018 om 2:57 AM schreef Jan: >>> Hello! >>> >> We're looking into it. > Right, this is not reproducible in the test suite, but I can reproduce > it when I replicate your setup. I created a special test suite that reproduces the problem reliably. This

We are running samba on a number of HP systems running HP/UX 11.00. We moved from samba version 2.0.7. to samba version 2.2.3a. We have about 200-400 smbd's running on one host. Samba version 2.2.3a was running without any problems for about two weeks. But now on two different servers indepent of each other, the file table was full. We found out that ONE smbd used about 5000 !!

All, my IMAP client [1] marks messages as deleted, but doesn't expunge. Dovecot (2.2.27-3+deb9u2) expunges them. Is this because the mailbox is part of public namespace? .... ::1.38247-::1.00143: MALP6 STORE 48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61 +FLAGS (\Deleted) ::1.00143-::1.38247: * 48 FETCH (FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen)) * 49 FETCH (FLAGS (\Deleted \Seen)) * 50 FETCH (FLAGS (\Deleted

Hello I'm using your program R in a course I'm taking at the University of Oslo, and thereby I need to download it to my PC. Unfortunately I do have some problems, I do not know whish files to download and how I do it. Can you please send me a list of what to download and a like where to find it? Thanks a lot, best regards Maria Befring Hovda PhD-student Norconserv AS, Seafood

So virtual/combined was meant to combine INBOX/Sent/Drafts and virtual/all display them in a threaded manner .. at least that was the intention ... rgds Matt > Aki Tuomi <mailto:aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi> > 18 February 2018 at 11:10 pm > > Uhm. > > combined folder seems to use INBOX for saving mails and contains mails > from Sent and Drafts. > > Not sure what your

Anyone had any experience they can share using a director setup with NFS and using the mdbox format instead of maildir. Is locking an issue on index files ?? rgds Matt -- <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>

Dear List, Does anyone know how to simulate data from a GLM object correponding to values of the independent (x) variable that do not occur in the original dataset? I have tried using simulate(), but it generates a new value of the dependent variable corresponding to each of the original x-values, which is not what I need. Ideally I whould like to simulate new values for GLM objects

Am attempting to bring my mailserver back to home server post house move and whilst I could use rsync have been trying to get to grips with dsync. However, I seem to have an issue - my current server specifies mail_location as maildir:/var/vmail/%d/%n/Maildir:LAYOUT=fs and my imapc config on new server is as follows ... imapc_host = old.mailserver.host imapc_user = %u imapc_master_user =

On 04/12/2018 01:40 AM, p23 power via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi, > We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - > formally known as hackers lab).  The round table sessions are a great > way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have > scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up > on those

Been experimenting with virtual mailbox and have a question :- I have defined 2 virtual mailboxes 'all' and 'combined' as follows ... virtual/all/dovecot-virtual virtual/combined inthread refs x-mailbox INBOX virtual/combined/dovecot-virtual !INBOX INBOX/Sent INBOX/Drafts all When new mail comes I would assume that both virtual mailboxes should actually see the message

Hi Timo, congrats to the merger with OX. Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support to - maybe - increase the priority in your roadmap: I'm currently working on a project to publish bank customer related documents inside a banking

Hi, We are looking for new "Round Table" topics (i.e. mini-bof topics - formally known as hackers lab). The round table sessions are a great way for us all to discuss face-to-face any burning topics. We have scheduled a table after each BoF sessions so that people can follow up on those conversation-topics. We will also setup round tables during the event when there is interest (i.e.

L.S. We use SAMBA 2.0.7 on SGI IRIX 6.5.4m to facilitate using unix shares on NT/W95 clients. I created a users.map with e.g. next line: aitht = nltroo01 when NT-domain user nltroo01 maps a unix share (via unix homes share) indeed his unix home directory (usr/people/aitht) is mapped to the client. Inspecting the process on the SGI-machine (SGUX07) with smbstatus however shows that user nobody

Hi, I did some experiments with dovecot on a glusterfs on the active nodes without a director. So I had concurrent access to the files. With the help of the available documentation about NFS and fcntl locks I managed to find out the following: With the plain mbox format dovecot seems to apply and to honor the fcntl locks. But since this format is not used any more in real setups, it is

We are running samba 2.2.3a ( for about 3000 users ) on HP/UX 11.11 fileservers. Our customers are complaining about slow response on the opening/closing of files in office/excel etc. In the samba log file we see the following messages : [2002/10/29 09:03:27, 0] ../source/smbd/oplock.c:(761) oplock_break: receive_smb timed out after 30 seconds. oplock_break failed for file My

Hi there! I would like to know the same! Currently I am using iptables to do it. Thanks. 2017-06-05 8:58 GMT-03:00 Chris <chris2014@postbox.xyz>: > All, > > I'm trying to setup a network with some virtual machines, that can connect > to each other and to the internet, but neither to the host nor to other > VMs. > > Is there any preconfigured network filter or

On 1/13/15, Michael Schwartzkopff <ms at sys4.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I did some experiments with dovecot on a glusterfs on the active nodes > without > a director. So I had concurrent access to the files. > > With the help of the available documentation about NFS and fcntl locks I > managed to find out the following: > > With the plain mbox format dovecot seems to