Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "possiblesb".
Did you mean:
possibles
2014 Sep 21
1
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
...oned, that there is a
possibility that the partition
table itself may have been clobbered in a way to change the real
starting address of the partition,
I decided to search for possible candidates for a superblock using fsck
in a shell script as follows:
sb=0; while [ $sb -lt 429496729600 ]; do
possibleSB=`e2fsck -n -b $sb /dev/sdc7 2>&1 | grep 'The superblock could
not be read|Bad magic number'`
[ "x$possibleSB" = "x" ] && echo $sb - "$possibleSB"
sb=`expr $sb + 512`
done > possibleSB
I found these blocks, the value of which might hint that...
2014 Sep 20
0
Re: Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:56 PM, jd1008 <jd1008 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member.
>
> This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S to mkfs, and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run.
>
> I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users Mailing List.
I would
2014 Sep 20
4
Possible bug in mkfs.ext3
I am reporting this on the advice of the Fedora Users Mailing List Member.
This the mailing list exchange outlining the problem with specifying -S
to mkfs,
and it's subsequent consequences when fsck is run.
I am reporting this per suggestions made to me on the Fedora Users
Mailing List.
The following is the mailing list exchange:
On 09/18/2014 07:01 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> On