search for: posixacls

Am 16.02.2017 um 12:11 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2017 01:54:24 -0800 > brian lamb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi Rowland, >> >> I see this in the ZFS props, if that’s related, you might be >> referring to something in ext3 that im not aware of at the moment. >> >> pool/myshare aclinherit

I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and sa-based xattrs. For the record, the latest version of samba that I've been successfully able to compile on FreeBSD 10.3 is Samba 4.5.5. On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:17:07 +0100 > Klaus Hartnegg via samba <samba at

On 16/03/2020 01:55, Marcio Demetrio Bacci via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I think the error is in converting the POSIx ACl, but I don't know how to > fix this. You posted: My two DC are Samba4 (migrated of the Windows 2008 Server) and my current File Servers are Windows 2008 Server. Yet, you have a Unix domain member: netbios name = SRV-FILESERVER Is this the machine that you

...o with our problem, I should mention that we run SIS with system uids. This needs some permission and posixacl tweaks on /IMAP/mail/attachments to work: # force all files created in this dir recursively) to have mode 0666 setfacl -d -m group::rwx -m o:rwx /IMAP/mail/attachments (you have to enable posixacls for the corresponding filesystem!) # trick dovecot to inherit parent dir's permissions (recursively) chmod 2777 /IMAP/mail/attachments Feel free to add these tweaks to the SIS documentation. ;-) Best Regards, -- Patrick Cernko <pcernko at mpi-klsb.mpg.de> +49 681 9325 5815 Joint Admi...

Hi list, Since I've upgraded from samba 3.0.23c to 3.0.25c my ACL's don't work as expected anymore. I'm not sure where the problem is, however. The symptoms are simple: with 3.0.23c, I could grant and revoke user, group and world write access to and from files in a share. With 3.0.25c, I can't do that anymore. When I deselect group or world read access and apply the

libvirt-3.0.0 When attemping to create a virtual machine I receive the error "error : Failed to switch root mount into slave mode: Permission denied”. I’m attempting to run qemu/libvirt/virt-manager in an Arch Linux lxc container on a Ubuntu 16.04 host. The host uses zfs for its containers. The arch container is set up as a priveleged container. I do already have kvm/qemu/libvirt working

Am 3/16/20 um 3:04 PM schrieb Ralph Boehme via samba: > Am 3/16/20 um 2:59 PM schrieb Rowland penny via samba: >> On 16/03/2020 13:50, Marcio Demetrio Bacci wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>>> Is this the machine that you cannot set the permissions on ? >>> Yes. >>> >>>> If so, what is the filesystem ? >>> Ext4 for SO and Ext4 for

Thanks for your help and replies. Yes, I meant "store dos attributes". It's pretty clear now that I need to keep the parameter 'store dos attributes=no' since 1) the server is an AD member server and 2) the map* parameters don't do the right thing under ZFS / NFSV4 ACLs. I've read that the steps Klaus Hartnegg listed resolves the issue on ZFS on Linux; however, I

I created a share with the config I gave below. As you can see in pictures I have two Everyone at "Permission" and one Everyone at "Share" section. These permissions comes when i create a share.. One of them is definitely related to samba because it is in the "share" section, but I guess the other two permits are comes with "posix acl". But i did not add

...uld mention that we run SIS with system uids. This needs > some permission and posixacl tweaks on /IMAP/mail/attachments to work: > > # force all files created in this dir recursively) to have mode 0666 > setfacl -d -m group::rwx -m o:rwx /IMAP/mail/attachments > (you have to enable posixacls for the corresponding filesystem!) > > # trick dovecot to inherit parent dir's permissions (recursively) > chmod 2777 /IMAP/mail/attachments > > > Feel free to add these tweaks to the SIS documentation. ;-) > > Best Regards, > Best regards, -- Patrick Cernko &l...

Hi Rowland, I see this in the ZFS props, if that’s related, you might be referring to something in ext3 that im not aware of at the moment. pool/myshare aclinherit restricted default pool/myshare acltype off default So, if you heard that I was going to use

On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:18:26 +0100 "Niels Dettenbach \(Syndicat IT & Internet\) via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Am 11. März 2017 00:04:13 MEZ schrieb Andrew Walker via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org>: > >I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and > >sa-based > > If you want to see a working samba / zfs

...l ntacl sysvolreset It finishes with no output or errors, but if I run sysvolcheck once again- the same problem is still there, not to mention that gpo's are still not working. My samba version is 4.2.0, the setup is a bit complicated since a use samba in a lxc container on a zfs fs (although posixacls are supported and common tasks such as domain provision, logon, dns and even gpo upon first modifications work) How can I fix this error or should I rebuild my domain from scratch? Thanks in advance!

Hi I am running the "samba-tool domain classicupgrade", and after solving some problems (thread http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-January/170777.html), now I am getting this error: # samba-tool domain classicupgrade --dbdir ~/sambav3 --realm XXXXXX.YYYYYY.TEST --use-xattrs=yes ~/sambav3/smb.conf -d9 ... init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: XXXXXX init_sam_from_ldap: Entry

I am trying to install samba 4.5.1 from source, as a domain controller only, under Ubuntu 16.04, with ZFS filesystem (actually inside an lxd container with ZFS backing). Out-of-the-box, samba-tool domain provision does not like the filesystem: ERROR(<class 'samba.provision.ProvisioningError'>): Provision failed - ProvisioningError: Your filesystem or build does not support posix

Am 11. März 2017 00:04:13 MEZ schrieb Andrew Walker via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: >I don't believe that ZFS on FreeBSD supports acltype=posixacl and >sa-based If you want to see a working samba / zfs / FreeBSD AD / PDC "ecosystem" i recommend just trying and exploring the open FreeBSD based "FreeNAS" which offers / allows exactly this. We run several

Hello, I've seen this upgrade error posted before: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2013-January/171022.html but either there is a different issue or I'm misreading the post. Basically when I run the classicupgrade (samba3 to 4) on a test machine, I get the following (the full debug output will be at the end of my post): ....... key added: key=CurrentVersion,key=Windows

On 06/12/2016 16:06, Brian Candler wrote: > Ah OK... I've just seen Rowland's reply, "Just don't use ZFS". That's > clear enough :-) FYI, I rebuilt the system using btrfs but initially I got the same issue [^1] It turns out this came from running inside an unprivileged lxd container. After setting "security.privileged true" it was happy. So I guess

-------- Forwarded Message -------- From: miranda <miranda at prodemge.gov.br> To: Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba3 -> Samba4 migration Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 10:21:09 -0300 Sorry , here i go : Original samba3 environment : root at centaurus:~# cat /etc/issue Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 \n \l root at centaurus:~# smbd -V Version 3.2.5 backend

Hello rsync users, I'm trying to copy every file which belongs to my Ubuntu 23.04 installation (stored on an ext4 fs to a ZFS storage disk. The command that I've used is : # rsync -avxHAX * /mnt/zroot2/zroot2/OS/Linux/EVO sending incremental file list rsync: [generator] set_acl: sys_acl_set_file(dev/kvm, ACL_TYPE_ACCESS): Operation not supported (95) rsync: [generator] set_acl: