search for: posix_acl_default

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3701 Summary: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr system.posix_acl_default failed: Permission denied Product: rsync Version: 2.6.7 Platform: x86 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org Reported...

...value, 1024); if (valuelen < 0); { perror("lgetxattr failed"); return 1; } printf("value %.*s", (int) valuelen, value); } return 0; } is returning: processing file /u00/root.20121121.210102.full/var/lib/nfs/sm processing attribute system.posix_acl_default lgetxattr failed: No data available output of stat: File: ''/u00/root.20121121.210102.full/var/lib/nfs/sm'' Size: 94 Blocks: 0 IO Block: 4096 directory Device: 3ah/58d Inode: 1331353 Links: 1 Access: (0755/drwxr-xr-x) Uid: (65534/ nobody) Gid: (...

...IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0 getxattr("/mnt/test/test/0220", "system.posix_acl_access", 0x11fffe940, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) stat("/mnt/test/test/0220", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0 getxattr("/mnt/test/test/0220", "system.posix_acl_default", 0x11fffe940, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) stat("/mnt/test/test/0220", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=6, ...}) = 0 getxattr("/mnt/test/test/0220", "user.SAMBA_PAI", 0x1207f0aa0, 1024) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) For every folder it wants to delete,...

...tat64(".", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 > getxattr(".", "system.posix_acl_access", 0xbe92eee0, 132) = -1 > ENODATA (No data available) stat64(".", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, > st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 getxattr(".", "system.posix_acl_default", > 0xbe92eee0, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) stat64(".", > {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 > > > I'm not well versed on samba and smb protocol. I'm not looking for a > fix to 4.3.11. I'm trying to understand what is happening....

...ource and 0x001f01ff on the target. This class of difference is a big problem for us. Because of classes 2 and 3, I expected to find the extended attribute values differed between source and target. However, the binary data in the extended attributes (security.NTACL, system.posix_acl_access, system.posix_acl_default, user.DOSATTRIB) is identical between source and target. Earlier, I said "from the perspective of the product, replication works remarkably well", and this is what I meant (accurate replication of extended attributes). Finally, here are my questions: Q1: Is it possible my observations are...

...est2 [root@Chakra data]# rsync -AavX -P -W --numeric-ids --delete --force test_pierre/ gargamel:/data/test_pierre/ building file list ... 17608 files to consider ./ test.file 5 100% 0.00kB/s 0:00:00 (1, 0.0% of 17608) logs_test/ .test.file.cAW83c: rsync_xal_set: lsetxattr system.posix_acl_default failed: Not a directory sent 559013 bytes received 78 bytes 65775.41 bytes/sec total size is 5611168219 speedup is 10036.23 rsync error: some files could not be transferred (code 23) at main.c(791) File is transmitted, but without its attributes. If I remove an attribute, transmit seems to wo...

...AAAADJAD/AR8AAQUAAAAAAAUVAAAANa8Kx/irrPNQ+nVmIQYAAAADJAD/AR8AAQUAAAAAAAUVAAAANa8Kx/irrPNQ+nVmIAwAAAADJAD/AR8AAQUAAAAAAAUVAAAANa8Kx/irrPNQ+nVmAAIAAAADFAD/AR8AAQEAAAAAAAUSAAAA system.posix_acl_access=0sAgAAAAEABwD/////BAAHAP////8IAAcAzsYtAAgABwDUxi0ACAAHAHnHLQAIAAcAkcctABAABwD/////IAAAAP////8= system.posix_acl_default=0sAgAAAAEABwD/////AgAHAM7GLQAEAAAA/////wgABwDOxi0ACAAHANTGLQAIAAcAecctAAgABwCRxy0AEAAHAP////8gAAAA/////w== ================================= /etc/fstab: ================================= /dev/mapper/fslinux2-root / ext4 errors=remount-ro,*user_xattr,acl,barrier=1* ==================...

...96, ...}) = 0 stat64(".", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 getxattr(".", "system.posix_acl_access", 0xbeb26ee0, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) stat64(".", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 getxattr(".", "system.posix_acl_default", 0xbeb26ee0, 132) = -1 ENODATA (No data available) stat64(".", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0 gettimeofday({1530539063, 61427}, NULL) = 0 gettimeofday({1530539063, 61912}, NULL) = 0 gettimeofday({1530539063, 62268}, NULL) = 0 fcntl64(28, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_WRLCK, wh...

Why is a windows 10 pro system issuing a sequence of smb2 commands every 30 seconds or so? SMB2:C CREATE(0x5), Sh(None), QFid, File=NULL@#15679 followed by SMB2:C QUERY INFORMATION(0x10),Class=Query FS Full Size, FID=0xB7CD3148(NULL@#15679) Folowed by SMB2:C CLOSE(0x6),FID=0xB7CD3148(NULL@#15679 Not sure why this sequence starts or stops. But it can run for hours at a time. This is happening

...s.paybycheck.com/phoneheadd.gif") = 0 [pid 3023] open("images.paybycheck.com/phoneheaders/accident.jpg", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 5 [pid 3023] fstat64(5, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0755, st_size=66799, ...}) = 0 [pid 3023] getxattr("images.paybycheck.com/phoneheaders", "system.posix_acl_default", 0xbfa081c0, 132) = -1 EOPNOTSUPP (Operation not supported) [pid 3023] open("images.paybycheck.com/phoneheaders/.accident.jpg.xJkXiG", O_RDWR|O_CREAT|O_EXCL|O_LARGEFILE, 0600) = 7 [pid 3023] fchmod(7, 0700) = 0 [pid 3023] read(5, "\377\330\377\340\0\20JFIF\0\1\2\...

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6590 Summary: [sender] could not find xattr #1 for home/jdoe/TheFresh Product: rsync Version: 3.0.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: stlman at

Hi all got a bit of and odd problem with ACL. Ive read up on a few bits in the samba howto and read some threads on here about it. Im not sure if this is a bug, something ive not done, doing wrong etc so anyone that could shed some light on it that would be great. Basically the windows box handles all user account processing and during creating a script for all this it will attempt to change the

...; - dst_entry->e_id = src_entry->e_id; - break; - default: - goto fail; - } - } - if (src != end) - goto fail; - return 0; -fail: - return -EINVAL; -} - -static char *xattr_prefix_table[] = { - [1] = "user.", - [2] = "system.posix_acl_access", - [3] = "system.posix_acl_default", - [4] = "trusted.", - [6] = "security.", -}; - -static int copy_single_xattr(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, - struct btrfs_root *root, u64 objectid, - struct ext2_ext_attr_entry *entry, - const void *data, u32 datalen) -{ - int ret = 0; - int name_...

Hi everyone, I described the reflink operation at the Linux Storage & Filesystems Workshop last month. Originally implemented as an ocfs2-specific ioctl, the consensus was that it should be a syscall from the get-go. Here's some first-cut patches. For people who have not seen reflink, either at LSF or on the ocfs2 wiki, the first patch contains Documentation/filesystems/reflink.txt to