search for: positiver

I have a data frame in wide format. There are six variables that represent two factors in long format 3x2, Valence and Temperature: > head(dpts) File Subj Time Group PainNeg.hot PainNeg.warm SociNeg.hot SociNeg.warm Positiv.hot Positiv.warm Errors 1 WB101_1_1_dp.txt 101 1 MNP 30.700000 13.75000 16.319048 35.166667 30.18333 14.383333 1 2

Hi, im little bit confused about Cohen's Kappa and i should be look into the Kappa function code. Is the easy formula really wrong? kappa=agreement-chance/(1-chance) many thanks christian ############################################################################### true-negativ:7445 false-positive:3410 false-negativ:347 true-positiv:772 classification-aggrement:68,6%

Am 30.08.2018 um 06:37 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately! >> >> I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS). >> It was very robust until now

Hello! I?m fitting a model with glm(family binomial). The best model counts 9 Variables and includes an interaction term that was generated by the product of to continuous variables (a*b). All variables are correlated under a value of 0.7 (Spearman rank order) While the estimates of both main effects are negativ, the resulting interaction term is positiv. This change of sign makes it difficult to

Hi! I have a problem using the legend command. I typed as follows: plot(foo bar...) legend(0.6,10, c("True Positiv", "False Positive", "False Negative","True Negative"), col = c("black",2,3,4),lty=c(1,1,1,1),pch=c(0,0,0,0), merge = TRUE, bg='gray90') The plot and its legend is displayed ok. The I apply a dev.cop2eps on it to save the

Hi, i'm newbie for this, but it's very interesting, but how i have to interpret the results if i get i.e. this results ? Is it correct - if the "Ratio of effect sd" is positiv than the Numerator effects are bigger , and the negative case vice-versa ? Ratio of effect standard deviations: 0.954 Log(sd ratio): -0.047 (se 0.828) Approximate 95% confidence

> Am 30.08.2018 um 17:24 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: > >> Am 30.08.2018 um 06:37 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: >>> >>>> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >>>> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >>>> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics

I''m using god* to monitor my mongrels. God looks at pid files to know the status of the cluster. It seems as though mongrel does not write a pid file until it has loaded the entire rails/project environment, which in my case, takes upwards of 90 seconds. Meanwhile, god is freaking out because it thinks that there aren''t mongrels running, and it tries to start them. Thankfully I

Dear R-List, (I am not sure whether this list is the right place for my question...) I have a dataframe df.cfa

hey, my function doesn?t work. can somebody help me? the graphic doesn?t work and also the function. thnx a lot. N=10 n=100 p_0=c(1/5,1-1/5) power = function(p,m) { set.seed(1000) H=matrix(0,nrow=N,ncol=1) for(i in 1:N) { x <- matrix(rnorm(n, 0, 0.5), ncol = m) y <- matrix(rnorm(n, 0, 0.8), ncol = m) l <- diag(cor(x, y)) q_1 = qnorm(0.05, 0, 0.05) q_2 = qnorm(1 - 0.05, 0, 0.05)

Hello, I am trying to run a linear regression analysis on my data set. For some reason most variables are removed due to singularities. My linear regression looks this way (I am using only partial data, which is selected by flags): fm<-lm(log(cplex6.time..sec..[flags]) ~ cplex6.cities[flags] + log(1/features.meanOver.frust[flags]) + log(1/features.meanOver.minDist[flags]) + [...]

> Am 30.08.2018 um 06:37 schrieb Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch>: >> >>> Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 >>> to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my >>> KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately! >>> >>> I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS). >>>

Hello together, I am working on liquid water profiles of clouds and would like to describe these profiles in relation to a reference profile. What is the best way to do this ? RMSE would equal positiv and negativ deviations. Is it better to use a correlation coefficient ? What is the best way, espacially when I want to find out profiles with the same behaviour / shape, which are just more or less

Hello! I?m fitting a model with glm(family binomial). The best model counts 9 Variables and includes an interaction term that was generated by the product of to continuous variables (a*b). All variables are correlated under a value of 0.7 (Spearman rank order) While the estimates of both main effects are negativ, the resulting interaction term is positiv. This change of sign makes it difficult to

I'm sorry to bother this list with such trivial questions, but I'm trying to take Prof. Ripley's advice in porting some Lapack wrappers into my own code, because they are not public. I'm specifically choosing programs from R-2.5.0/src/modules/lapack/Lapack.c. I can't seem to understand the context in functions such as: <snip> error(_("the leading minor

Hello dear Samba folks! I am trying to set up an Samba4 AD DC for more than a whole week now. Being new i tried to learn and diagnose as much as i can, but soon I am at the end. So please help me before I go crazy :) The problem in short: I can't add groupmappings. What else doesnt work in the backgroud, I don't know, i just tested the core functionalities, which seem to work. Here the

I have a specific business problem that I'm hoping someone has ideas and/or has already worked out a solution. My application needs to be able to automatically create and issue faxes to many different fax machines. The volume is going to be very high. And it is only about sending faxes and not receiving them. My application is hosted by an ASP but the Linux (Fedora 2) server is

Since the update from kernel-2.6.32-754.2.1.el6.x86_64 to kernel-2.6.32-754.3.5.el6.x86_64 I can not boot my KVM guests anymore!? The workstation panics immediately! I would not have expected this behavior now (last phase of OS). It was very robust until now (Optiplex Workstation). I see some KVM related lines in the changelog.diff. Before swimming upstream: Does some one have problems