search for: portrange

Hi, Could u recommend a secure ftp daemon? I want to be able to control the ports it uses.... and not to have to let all of the upper ports open. --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

...ems is the restriction that only root can bind to ports < 1024. Many a dollar has been wasted on workarounds and -often- the resulting security holes. Fortunately on FreeBSD 6.1 (and probably older versions as well) you can disable this remnant of trust-by-convention. host$ sysctl net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhigh=0 That simple. Add it to your /etc/sysctl.conf today! posted by Slim @ 4:18 PM

Hi, folks. I am trying to implement reverse proxy using squid with mac_portacl, but i have problem while binding squid to port 80. Am i missed something? Here is my mac_portacl variables: # sysctl security.mac.portacl. security.mac.portacl.enabled: 1 security.mac.portacl.suser_exempt: 1 security.mac.portacl.autoport_exempt: 1 security.mac.portacl.port_high: 1023 security.mac.portacl.rules:

...ended up not using any firewall or router, because of some stupid bugs that were never fixed in the Linksys routers.) For a *ix-type system, the sysctl settings need to match the "user range" you want to dedicate to certain apps. Here are the settings I use, even currently: net.inet.ip.portrange.first=49152 net.inet.ip.portrange.last=65535 net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst=65535 net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast=49152 What I'm doing is setting the "automatic" port-number selection for most apps to select an open port between 49152 and 65535 -- clearly far away from the 32xxx range I...

We have 10 SuperMicro PDSMi+ 5015M-MTs that are panic'ing every few days. This started shortly after upgrade from 6.2-RELEASE to 6.3-RELEASE with freebsd-update. Other than switching to a debugging kernel, a little sysctl tuning, and patching with freebsd-update, they are stock. The debugging kernel was built from source that is also being patched with freebsd-update. These systems are

...VmWare seem to have the same EFI boot code & output the same error message. > > Probably not a problem for the syslinux mailing list. A packet capture may help figure out why there's a negative tftp/tftpd interaction. (host 192.0.2.4 and host 192.0.2.5) and udp and (port 69 or (src portrange 1024-65535 and dst portrange 1024-65535)) This should be the easiest filter and can be done on the tftpd system. > -----Original Message----- > From: Luke Ledgerd > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:06 PM > To: 'syslinux at zytor.com' > Subject: pxelinux efi64 boot woes on...

I want to capture all my Asterisk traffic (including RTP) and then analyse it. My plan was to use tcpdump and then analyse with Wireshark. The following works: tcpdump -i eth0 -s 0 -w /tmp/tcpdump.1 But I want to be a bit more selective: tcpdump -C 100 -W 10 -w /tmp/tcpdump -i eth1 -s 0 udp and dst port >= 5060 This doesn't capture the RTP traffic. Could anyone advise what I'm

http://www.niallbrady.com/2014/06/11/when-uefi-network-booting-on-a-hyperv-gen-2-vm-you-might-get-pxe-e99-unexpected-network-error/ P.S. It's not this and I'm getting a PXE-E99 tftp failure "Unexepected Network Error", so I'll guess I'll need to investigate what kind of TFTP server makes hyper-v happy. Virtualbox, VmWare seem to have the same EFI boot code & output

The manual page says, that rcmd() is only to be used by root's processes. On other OSes (Solaris, AIX), trying to call rcmd() without being root simply fails. FreeBSD, however, tries to be helpful and invokes rcmdsh in this case, which is inefficient and leaves the stderr's filedescriptor (fd2p) unfilled. Why? My understanding is, this is to make it harder for would-be attackers to

...VmWare seem to have the same EFI boot code & output the same error message. > > Probably not a problem for the syslinux mailing list. A packet capture may help figure out why there's a negative tftp/tftpd interaction. (host 192.0.2.4 and host 192.0.2.5) and udp and (port 69 or (src portrange 1024-65535 and dst portrange 1024-65535)) This should be the easiest filter and can be done on the tftpd system. > -----Original Message----- > From: Luke Ledgerd > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:06 PM > To: 'syslinux at zytor.com' > Subject: pxelinux efi64 boot woes on...

Hello! I am new to the list and got a simple question. Is it possible to connect with a headphone to Asterisk on the same machine? I tried a portrange 5060:5061 in sip.conf but that doesn't work. I can connect with sjphone to an Asterisk on a remote machine only. Thanks in advance! -- Andreas Meyer Mein VoIP-Anschlu?: 06341620317 2620317@sipgate.de

Hi, do somebody knows how to sniff RTP and SIP traffic only for a faster debugging ? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090629/5e160c92/attachment.htm

...ame EFI boot code & output the same error message. >> >> Probably not a problem for the syslinux mailing list. > > A packet capture may help figure out why there's a negative tftp/tftpd interaction. > > (host 192.0.2.4 and host 192.0.2.5) and udp and (port 69 or (src portrange 1024-65535 and dst portrange 1024-65535)) > > This should be the easiest filter and can be done on the tftpd system. > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Luke Ledgerd >> Sent: Monday, November 24, 2014 3:06 PM >> To: 'syslinux at zytor.com' >> Subj...

I have some troublesome numbers that I would like to capture the SIP dialogue when I am calling them. When I am about to dial the number, is there any way to turn on SIP debugging in the dial plan before I make the call? (and turn it off after the call is completed?) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi Jeremy, list, On 06/26/2016 12:11 AM, Jeremy Allison wrote: > We should probably have something in the server that logs > this as an official "event". Can someone log a RFE bug in > the bugzilla so we don't forget this request ? I created this bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11998 I hope it is (approximately) what you mean. :-) Best regards, MJ

Hi, first i must tell you, that my english is not the best, i hav learned my english from manpages and documentation. Please excuse this. I have setted up a Box w/FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE for connecting to the w3 through an DSL/ATM-Connection. Now i know the stateful handling of firewall-rules under linux with iptables.In the second i have understand that FreeBSD comes with the netfilter-extensions.

...en I get: Data socket error: Connection failed, connection timed out. This is for passive mode. In active mode I can login and then I get: List failed. No port specified. The FTP-server can operate both in active and in passive mode, and for passive I´ve configured: Fixed ip (is my outside ip) and portrange is default: 1024-65535. As I´ve said, both active and passive mode works great with port 21, so there must be something else wrong here. I´m obviously overlooking something important but what? Regards Rikard

...y_v3: 0 vfs.ffs.doasyncfree: 1 vfs.ffs.doreallocblks: 1 vfs.ffs.compute_summary_at_mount: 0 net.local.stream.sendspace: 8192 net.local.stream.recvspace: 8192 net.local.dgram.maxdgram: 2048 net.local.dgram.recvspace: 4096 net.local.inflight: 0 net.local.taskcount: 0 net.local.recycled: 0 net.inet.ip.portrange.lowfirst: 1023 net.inet.ip.portrange.lowlast: 600 net.inet.ip.portrange.first: 49152 net.inet.ip.portrange.last: 65535 net.inet.ip.portrange.hifirst: 49152 net.inet.ip.portrange.hilast: 65535 net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedhigh: 1023 net.inet.ip.portrange.reservedlow: 0 net.inet.ip.portrange.randomi...

...5 here: http://www.625.ru/rlsp/ Direct links: http://www.625.ru/rlsp/in_pcb.c.patch.4 http://www.625.ru/rlsp/in_pcb.c.patch.5 It seems to be working on my 4.9 box =) - after recompiling the kernel the system picks up a random port for making a connetion. Especially - when I increase net.inet.ip.portrange.last, for example, to value 20000. The ports become 'more random' :) What the patch does: it creates a sysctl variable net.inet.ip.random_lport, which is "off" by default. When it is nonzero, the OpenBSD method is used in sys/netinet/in_pcb.c (in in_pcbbind() in FreeBSD 4 and in_...

On Tue, 2017-09-19 at 17:02 +0200, L.P.H. van Belle via samba wrote: > Hai Mark, > > I see the bugreport for this is still untouched. > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11998 I've closed that bug now. Extensive work has been done to add this feature to Samba 4.7, due out this week: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_Audit_Logging Two new debug classes,