search for: portfoliosim

R-devel, I'm in the process of choosing a name for a new package. I've already decided that the name will have two parts, 'portfolio' and 'sim', but can't decide between 'portfolioSim' and 'portfolio.sim'. Is there any good reason to choose one over the other? Thanks in advance, Jeff -- Jeff Enos Kane Capital Management jeff at kanecap.com

A new version of package 'portfolio' is now available on CRAN. Also available are new packages 'backtest', for basic spread-based hypothesis testing, and 'portfolioSim', a general framework for portfolio simulation. Last March we wrote R-packages regarding our desire to build a suite of tools for portfolio analytics in R: https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2006/000171.html Since then we've made progress by improving 'portfolio' and addin...

I'm in the process of converting some S3 methods to S4 methods. I have this function : setGeneric("enrichmentCalc", function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...){standardGeneric("enrichmentCalc")}) setMethod("enrichmentCalc", c("GenomeDataList", "BSgenome"), function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...) { ... ... ... })

...mation (0.2-3), multcomp (1.1-6), mvpart (1.3-1), ncvreg (2.0), neuralnet (1.3), nlstools (0.0-10), noia (0.94), nor1mix (1.1-2), party (0.9-9993), pcaPP (1.8), penalized (0.9-30), pgirmess (1.4.4), phyclust (0.1-5), picante (1.0-1), plotrix (2.8-3), plsdof (0.2-0), pmg (0.9-42), portfolio (0.4-5), portfolioSim (0.2-6), prefmod (0.8-19), PropCIs (0.1-5), PwrGSD (1.16), pyramid (1.2), qpcR (1.2-6), QRMlib (1.4.5), qvcalc (0.8-5), R.filesets (0.8.0), R2HTML (2.0.0), R2jags (0.02-02), randomSurvivalForest (3.6.2), rattle (2.5.24), rbenchmark (0.3), RcmdrPlugin.MAc (1.0.6), RcmdrPlugin.MAc (1.0.5), Rcpp (0.7....