search for: portend

Displaying 12 results from an estimated 12 matches for "portend".

Did you mean: ported
2012 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] Publication: Data Races vs. Data Race Bugs: Telling the Difference with Portend
Hello, We have a publication in ASPLOS 2012 that uses the LLVM infrastructure. Is it possible to add this to the publications web page: http://llvm.org/pubs/ ? Publication: Data Races vs. Data Race Bugs: Telling the Difference with Portend Link: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2150997 Abstract: Even though most data races are harmless, the harmful ones are at the heart of some of the worst concurrency bugs. Alas, spotting just the harmful data races in programs is like finding a needle in a haystack: 76%-90% of the true data rac...
2015 Dec 17
6
google chrome future / centos 7
I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this Linux system will no longer be supported. Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the centos world we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)?
2015 Dec 17
2
google chrome future / centos 7
...e following banner when I start up google-chrome > > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: > > > > This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates > > because this Linux system will no longer be supported. > > > > Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few > > months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable > > (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the centos world > > we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)? > > I can confirm that...
2012 Oct 25
0
[LLVMdev] [klee-dev] Linearizability
Hi Andreas, Cloud9 is a project that has an extensive POSIX environment model which also lets you symbolically execute multithreaded programs. It is based on KLEE. http://dslab.epfl.ch/pubs/cloud9.pdf Portend builds on top of Cloud9 to perform race detection/classification: http://dslab.epfl.ch/pubs/portend.pdf Cloud9 code base is also public, it might be of interest to you: http://cloud9.epfl.ch/ Best, On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Andreas Wilhelm <andreas.wilhelm at in.tum.de> wrote: &gt...
2015 Dec 17
2
google chrome future / centos 7
...ing the following banner when I start up google-chrome >> 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: >> >> This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates >> because this Linux system will no longer be supported. >> >> Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few >> months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable >> (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the centos world >> we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)? >> >> >> ______...
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
...wrote: > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: > > This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates > because this Linux system will no longer be supported. > > Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few > months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable > (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the centos world > we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)? > > > ______________________________...
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
...e: > > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: > > This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates > because this Linux system will no longer be supported. > > Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few > months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable > (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the centos world > we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)? I can confirm that I see this on RHEL7 as we...
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
...when I start up google-chrome >>> 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: >>> >>> This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates >>> because this Linux system will no longer be supported. >>> >>> Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few >>> months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable >>> (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the centos world >>> we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)? >>> >>...
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
...n I start up google-chrome >> > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: >> > >> > This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates >> > because this Linux system will no longer be supported. >> > >> > Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few >> > months when the underlying changes make their way into their -stable >> > (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the centos world >> > we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)? >> >>...
2015 Dec 17
4
google chrome future / centos 7
...ing the following banner when I start up google-chrome >> 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines: >> >> This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates >> because this Linux system will no longer be supported. >> >> Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7 in a few >> months when the underlying changes make their way into their >> -stable (since, as I understand it/as last I remember, in the >> centos world we don't have benefit of the RH chromium release)? > > I can confirm that I s...
2006 Jul 24
2
RandomForest vs. bayes & svm classification performance
Hi This is a question regarding classification performance using different methods. So far I've tried NaiveBayes (klaR package), svm (e1071) package and randomForest (randomForest). What has puzzled me is that randomForest seems to perform far better (32% classification error) than svm and NaiveBayes, which have similar classification errors (45%, 48% respectively). A similar difference in
2007 Oct 24
182
Yager on ZFS
Not sure if it''s been posted yet, my email is currently down... http://weblog.infoworld.com/yager/archives/2007/10/suns_zfs_is_clo.html Interesting piece. This is the second post from Yager that shows solaris in a pretty good light. I particularly like his closing comment: "If you haven''t checked out ZFS yet, do, because it will eventually become ubiquitously implemented