search for: port5

Hello, I use Gentoo and I can't get R 2.0.1 to compile. I used the portage system, Gentoo's source package sytem, and after it uncompresses the source to R, it says that I don't have a fortran compiler. It told me to use f77 flag and re-emerge gcc, which I did with the f77 and fortran flags, but it still won't compile. Does anyone have any ideas? I suspect that gcc has changed

Dear R People: Please excuse the off topic question. What are the dimensions of A-4 Paper, please? Actually, the question should read, "how do I set up a LaTex file to fix A-4 paper, please?" Thanks much! Sincerely, Erin Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: hodgess at gator.uhd.edu

Hi, Is there any 64-bit compatible version of 'R' available? Thanks & Regards, Uttam Phulwale Tata Consultancy Services Limited Mailto: uttam.phulwale@tcs.com Website: http://www.tcs.com [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I have been looking at Vorbis support material for the past few days and have found no helpful reference to encoding Vorbis files. I found a diagram ( http://stoffke.port5.com/en_block/block_en.html ) and a document titled "Vorbis illuminated" but they disagree on the flow of the encoder. Is the diagram accurate or should I believe the (difficult to read) vorbis illuminated? My apologies if there is information right under my nose on the Vorbis website...

...n maintaining R for Mandrake. But he has a site for R and Mandrake in italian and this may provide some first clues. HTH, Ioannis -- Ioannis C. Dimakos, Ph.D. University of Patras Department of Elementary Education Patras, GR-26500 GREECE http://www.elemedu.upatras.gr/dimakos/ http://yannishome.port5.com/

Hello anyone, I'm trying to install R on Mandriva 2006 distribution via rpm file with the line urpmi R-2.0.0-1mdk.i586.rpm but I got an error message saying that the file is not accessible due to some info problem. I also tried with a source code in R-2.1.1.tar but I think that there is some problem concerning the new version of gcc (4.x), so I downgraded it to gcc 3.4.5 but it does

Hi, I’m trying to work out the behavior of llvm-mca on instructions with ProcResGroups. My current understanding is: When an instruction requests a port group (e.g., HWPort015) and all of its atomic sub-resources (e.g., HWPort0,HWPort1,HWPort5), HWPort015 is marked as “reserved” and is issued in parallel with HWPort0, HWPort1, and HWPort5, blocking future instructions from reserving HWPort015 for the duration but not explicitly blocking any of HWPort0, HWPort1, or HWPort5 (although those ports are in fact blocked because the instruction...

Dear list members: I have the following data: group <- rep(rep(1:2, c(5,5)), 3) time <- rep(1:3, rep(10,3)) subject <- rep(1:10, 3) p.pa <- c(92, 44, 49, 52, 41, 34, 32, 65, 47, 58, 94, 82, 48, 60, 47, 46, 41, 73, 60, 69, 95, 53, 44, 66, 62, 46, 53, 73, 84, 79) P.PA <- data.frame(subject, group, time, p.pa) The ten subjects were randomly assigned to one of two groups and measured

I am trying to configure a VegaStream 50 FXO to work with asterisk. The problem that I am having is that the VegaStream does not support incoming registration from asterisk. VegaStream only allows outbound registration. My question is does asterisk allow incoming registration from an FXO? If yes how? Or better yet, has anybody been able to make the VegaStream FXO work with asterisk? According

...oogle/gemmlowp/pull/91> and this PR improving WebM <https://github.com/webmproject/libwebp/commit/67748b41dbb21a43e88f2b6ddf6117f4338873a3>). We think it could also be used to improve instruction selection to offload some ports (typically un-vectorize some computations on Intel CPUs, where port5 typically becomes saturated for vector-intensive computations).To enable this, it is important that: - The design allows for using the tools as a library, which is the case of both implementations.- Prediction is reasonably fast since it’s going to be used in a loop. I think that the listener-based...

Hi all, At Sony we developed an LLVM based performance analysis tool named llvm-mca. We currently use it internally to statically measure the performance of code, and to help triage potential problems with target scheduling models. We decided to post this RFC because we are interested in the feedback from the community, and we also believe that other people might be interested in a tool like