search for: port001

Hey list, Does anything exist that can show me which lines are explicitly tested? RCov is great, but it doesn''t really give a sense of _actual_ coverage, indeed, there is no guarantee that functions executed were in fact called as the result of a line being tested. I know nothing of the rspec internals, but would a simple list of executed lines be a relatively simple feature to add?

Hey, I''m using rspec and rails and have a spec that tests if a before_filter is executed, I also have a spec that tests if a method called by the filter is executed. It appears however that when I should_receive something, it is no longer actually called when I fire the http request. I''m not sure how, or where exactly I should manually fire the filter, either before or after the

Hey list, RSpec is great, I''ve been using it at work for a couple of months now. One gripe I have is that I find it hard to know exactly to what extent my code is covered by the specs. I am aware of RCov and Heckle; they''re great, but I''d like to demonstrate another perspective of coverage analysis I''ve hacked up. The perspective is that of what is mocked and

Hey, I''m using rspec and rspec_on_rails to test some RSS feed views, the problem is that the specs spew out messy warnings when they run: ignoring attempt to close channel with link opened at byte 61, line 3 closed at byte 141, line 5 attributes at open: {} text around open: "ss version=\"2.0\">\n <channel>\n <title" text around close:

Hi, I''m having a hard time understanding why when I make a request via an AJAX call that triggers a redirect, the redirect seems to be performed by the server and the response of that subsequent request is the one sent back to the client. I am aware I can send back JavaScript in the response to perform the location change rather than a redirect but I''d like to have the 302

Anyone know of a utility that creates URLs similar to those used on Wikipedia and such sites? (foo.com/URLs_Like_This). I could quite easily do this with gsub and/or some regular expressions, but I''d rather used a tried and true function just incase I miss something important. Cheers Ian -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Hey list, The time it takes for my specs to run is starting to get a little long (~45 seconds), and annoying enough for me to do something about it. I''ve written a simple formatter that prints out the top 10 slowest examples in an attempt to identify any low hanging fruit amongst a spec suite.

Hi, I noticed recently that require ''rspec'' on my machine was taking close to half a second. That''s not a huge amount of time, but it is still the single slowest part of my test suite. It boils down to Ruby 1.9''s rather slow require. I''m using 1.9.3, but I''d still like to shave off some of the require time. As an experiment, I went into

Hi, I''m writing a plugin (my first) that adds question validation support (alternative to captchas). I''m obviously gonna need to provide a generator for the migration of the questions table, I''m just not sure if I should generate the model too or just leave it in the plugin. If I do leave the model in the plugin then won''t I also have to hardcode to table name

Hey list, I''ve just released a new project called Boogaloo. It''s a simple cache server that provides persistent and temporary caching, you can also use it to house your own custom services. The main release announcement is over on ruby-talk (sorry for those reading this twice). I''m posting it here too as although Boogaloo isn''t specific to Rails, I did create

Hey, I''ve tried every trick I can find, yet I''m still unable to get the json gem and ActiveSupport to play nice. No matter in which order I load json and active support, I still end up with: NoMethodError: undefined method `[]'' for #<JSON::Ext::Generator::State:0x104b7fac0> I''m trying to use the JSON object directly, *not* as a ActiveSupport backend:

Hey list, I''m trying to use the rcov integration that rspec provides in my Rails application. As per the documentation on the website, I''ve created the following rake task: lib/tasks/specs_with_rcov.rake: require ''spec/rake/spectask'' desc "Run all specs with rcov" Spec::Rake::SpecTask.new(''specs_with_rcov'') do |t| t.rcov = true