search for: porinting

Hi, I think there has a incorrect kfree in pcirom_init function. In pcirom_init function priv porinter could be free only when priv != null and priv->rom is null. Signed-off-by: wuxu.wu <wuxu.wu at huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c

priv porinter could be free only when priv != null and priv->rom is null. --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c index 9b91da0..d776e01 100644 ---

priv porinter could be free only when priv != null and priv->rom is null. Signed-off-by: wuxu.wu <wuxu.wu at huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c index 9b91da0..d776e01 100644 ---

(re-sending as plain text) NACK. The before and after of this patch are functionally identical. The if-block returns unconditionally ("return priv;"), so the kfree will only ever be reached if the condition in the if-statement evaluates to false. Explicitly writing out an else-block is thus superfluous. Op 03-01-2020 om 09:10 schreef wuxu.wu: > Hi, I think there has a incorrect

...have had to code to... AddPrinterA to LPT1: and then hack the settings of each printer... yuck! Am I appraoching time for a sniffer to debug this one, or should I set additional logging somehow? Also, when I add the port and successfully then use AddPrinterA, I do not get anything in the log for porinting a printer at the network printer. So, error or successful, nothing logged at log level 100. -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems Remove the upper case letters NOSPAM to contact me directly.

About an hour ago I started getting regular messages from cron running /usr/libexec/save-entropy which contail the single line "IPv4: not found" Anybody got any ideas ? The only thing I did at that porint was to do an 'rm' of /usr/obj in preparation for compiling this mornings 61 code to test it. Removing /usr/obj should not affect a running system at all. The box is currently

For those of you who are interested, here's is the link: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html (Sorry for x-posting... I thought it is relevant to both lists.) Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Liaw, Andy [mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:28 PM > To: 'Sinclair, Andrew (MIP London)'; 's-news' >