search for: porinter

Hi, I think there has a incorrect kfree in pcirom_init function. In pcirom_init function priv porinter could be free only when priv != null and priv->rom is null. Signed-off-by: wuxu.wu <wuxu.wu at huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c b...

priv porinter could be free only when priv != null and priv->rom is null. --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c...

priv porinter could be free only when priv != null and priv->rom is null. Signed-off-by: wuxu.wu <wuxu.wu at huawei.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c b...

...o the kfree will only ever be reached if the condition in the if-statement evaluates to false. Explicitly writing out an else-block is thus superfluous. Op 03-01-2020 om 09:10 schreef wuxu.wu: > Hi, I think there has a incorrect kfree in pcirom_init function. In > pcirom_init function priv porinter could be free only when priv != null > and priv->rom is null. > > Signed-off-by: wuxu.wu <wuxu.wu at huawei.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/shadowpci.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/...

I'm still working on this Access Denied with CUPS, etc... I have a little command line utility written which uses the AddPrinterA function of WinSpool.drv to add a printer instance for a driver which has already been installed on the system. If I add the port to the UNC of the printer and restart the spooler task I no longer get the Access Denied error. However, trying to have AddPrinterA

About an hour ago I started getting regular messages from cron running /usr/libexec/save-entropy which contail the single line "IPv4: not found" Anybody got any ideas ? The only thing I did at that porint was to do an 'rm' of /usr/obj in preparation for compiling this mornings 61 code to test it. Removing /usr/obj should not affect a running system at all. The box is currently

For those of you who are interested, here's is the link: http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html (Sorry for x-posting... I thought it is relevant to both lists.) Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: Liaw, Andy [mailto:andy_liaw at merck.com] > Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 4:28 PM > To: 'Sinclair, Andrew (MIP London)'; 's-news' >