Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "popp0".
Did you mean:
poppe
2006 Dec 28
0
lmer: Interpreting random effects contrasts and model formulation
...4 1.4422308 1.200929 0.992 0.986 0.985 0.980
Residual 0.0025377 0.050375
How do I interpret these contrasts? If it were fixed effects, it would
be treatment contrasts which I understand. Is it a similar thing here
where the Variance of 39.57 for popP1 is actually:
Variance(popP0 - popP1) = Variance(popP0) + Variance(popP1) -
2*Corr(popP0,popP1)*StdDev(popP0)*StdDev(popP1)
=> 39.57 = 52.12 + StdDev(popP1)^2 - 2*0.995*7.219522*StdDev(popP1)
(e) Question 3: For the model (c), there is another line at the top of
the results with the intercept corresponding to (1|Populat...