search for: popolit

Don't you have the same problem with other atoms, e.g. variable names? This sounds like something that should be implemented in the language's runtime library. On May 4, 2014 7:15 PM, "Alexander Popolitov" <popolit at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I'm trying to implement lisp's funcall function, which roughly calls a > function, name of which > is known only at runtime. > I know that LLVM IR 'call' directive can accept function pointers, so the...

For some reason the mail didn't got through the first time, so sending it again. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: code-generating constant strings Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 01:56:11 +0100 From: Alexander Popolitov <popolit at gmail.com> To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu. Hi, everyone! I have maybe very naive question, but nontheless. I'm experimenting with Kaleidoscope tutorial and I want to morph it into something similar to McCarthy's initial Lisp. For that, I need to implement symbols, which...

Hi, everyone! I have maybe very naive question, but nontheless. I'm experimenting with Kaleidoscope tutorial and I want to morph it into something similar to McCarthy's initial Lisp. For that, I need to implement symbols, which I thought I should implement as pointers to structures, and those structures would contain at least one field, which would be symbol's name. So, here's a

At the LLVM Developers' Meeting in November, I promised to work on isolating a subset of the current test suite that is useful for benchmarking. Having looked at this in more detail, most of the applications and benchmarks in the test suite are useful for benchmarking, and so I think that a better way of phrasing it is that we should construct a list of programs in the test suite that are not