search for: pop3server

Hi all, Please correct me if I'm going about this the wrong way. We currently have a 3 system Mail server set up - two machines are the load balanced frontends running Dovecot and Postfix, and the third machine is our NFS. Over the past 4 months or so, I've tweaked and optimized our mail servers, and we receive roughly 3 million emails a day combined through this setup. Sometimes,

...dovecot.fi> wrote: >> >> 4) you can use autoexpunge here, i guess. > > Are messages marked in anyway once they?ve been fetched with pop3 (like marked read?). If so, I could auto-archive them. Yes, they are marked read. See "Flag changes" on https://wiki2.dovecot.org/POP3Server br, Teemu > > (I don?t mind storing old mail as much as I mind storing it in the inbox) >

Hello, I originally just typed up a 5 paragraph essay on my problems but just deleted it all. basically I need to find out where to start looking to find out what is the problem with my dovecot pop3 setup. I switched from courier imap/pop3 to dovecot imap/pop3. I have had super high loads (40+ and overnight one server went to 511) and its been a nightmare fighting with this new setup for the

On 13.04.2017 14:16, @lbutlr wrote: > On 2017-04-13 (05:11 MDT), "@lbutlr" <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: >> 1) How do I add a secure (TLS) POP3 service to dovecot >> 2) can I restrict access to that to specific users? Domains? >> >> OT, but someone probably knows, is secured POP3 going to work with gmail? > 4) Can I force pop3 connections to remove

...thentication My primary concerns are performance and security. Before I go down that route of migrating away from qmail-pop3d, I'd appreciate some answers and feedback on the following. There is mention of the Maildir filename extension W= for virtual file size here: http://wiki.dovecot.org/POP3Server However, I can't find any MDAs which support writing the filename in this format. Maildrop seems to support S= only? If Dovecot is only able to read W= in the filename, I would imagine that it might make sense to have an MDA like Maildrop write the message to disk, replacing all LF with CR+L...

...\%USERNAME%\outlook\%USERNAME%.pab" ShowNamesBy=0 ;*************************************************************** ; Section 5 - Values for each internet account. ;*************************************************************** ;[Account1] ;UniqueService=No ;AccountName=Outlook Tips POP3 ;POP3Server=mail.outlook-tips.net ;SMTPServer=mail.outlook-tips.net ;POP3UserName=outlookt ;EmailAddress=tips at outlook-tips.net ;POP3UseSPA=0 ;DisplayName= ;ReplyEMailAddress= ;SMTPUseAuth=1 ;SMTPAuthMethod=0 ;ConnectionType=0 ;LeaveOnServer=0x0 ;ConnectionOID=MyConnection ;POP3Port=110 ;POP3UseSSL=0 ;Server...

Hi all, Over the past week our mail server which NFS mounts the /home directory for mail has been experiencing major load issues. When doing a 'top', it appeared that slapd was the culprit (we use LDAP for authentication), but after upgrading the system and updating ldap, the cpu usage for LDAP has gone down, but the load average as not. I'm using Maildir. Everything from /home

Hello, I installed new mail server postfix + dovecot with beckend in postgresql. But when users not deleted mail from server then received all mails from maildir a few everyday..In dovecot logs I can't see any problem. He use outlook or thunderbird with pop3. What is problem whit this? dovecot --version 1.0.7 dovecot -n # 1.0.7: /etc/dovecot.conf log_path: /var/log/dovecot.log

Hello, I migrate my server POP3/IMAP recently the Courier-IMAP for Dovecot and am having problems when the user configures your e-mail client to leave a copy of mail on the server. All mail in the inbox, are brought all the time that you check your mailbox input via POP3, causing a large traffic of unnecessary data every time. In my opinion you should bring only the new mail, unread. Can you

Hello, In the past we've had 4 loadbalanced servers configured with courier pop3 and dovecot handling respectively POP3 and IMAP connections. These 4 servers have a shared NFS storage on a Netapp FAS3220 controller with SAS disks. This setup is handling 50 POP3 sessions per second without any problems. Now we're installing 6 new loadbalanced servers to do the same job on the same

Hello everybody! We have a interesting issue about dovecot behavior here. First, the scenario: We have 2 server running with the same load, one with our old pop3 solution (out of date) and other with Dovecot. We realized that dovecot are comsuming more CPU, and this consumption is growing day by day. When we starts dovecot, it runs between 40%-45% of CPU consumption and our old

Hi, Whitbox Linux 3 (RHEL) Dovecot 1.0.rc29 Using NFS From time to time does all mail get re-downloaded to Thunderbird. I would believe this has something to do with an index problem. I upgraded to 1.0 a few months ago but that didn't work well so I installed version 1.0.rc29 which worked better but we still get this problem from time to time. DOes anyone know if it is a good idea to