search for: pontis

Hi, After reading the wiki about Pontis changing the webpage, I wrote and asked their tech. support about it. I've gotten the ansver a while ago and forgot to share it until now. I dont know what to make of it... Also made a small update at the wiki. /Joel ---------begin forwarded message--------- Hello, we've still to solve...

FYI http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1

On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > FYI > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with image/sound processing, and HMMR, it's still far behind. Is this only

Olivier Meurant: > I have run the john the ripper test. > I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from > http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2 > > To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc. > I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86-sse2 > (seems to be the best on x86-32) > The makefile

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 Regards, Stefano

On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php? > page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what architecture is compiled for etc. It's entirely possible that they are accidentally compiling the llvm-gcc binaries for x86-32 and the gcc ones for x86-64 for example. If

On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Stefano Delli Ponti < stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > I don't know what you think about this, but shouldn't it be more > meaningful to make these tests with -O3? I mean, we ought to make the > comparisons with the highest level of optimization available for both of > the compilers. It is difficult to compare an intermediate

On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > Chris Lattner: >> Comparing -O3 (and even -O4) is interesting, but we want all >> optimization levels to perform better than GCC :). Lots of people >> use -O2 and -Os, so comparing against other compiler's -O2 and -Os >> levels is just as interesting as comparing -O3 vs -O3. > > My thinking

On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:37:53AM +0100, Renato Golin wrote: > On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti > <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 > > For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the > former is really important), but for the rest,

...tes, including relevant correspondence I've had with the companies, which probably needn't be put on the web page. The projects part is still a little sketchy. I have this as Evolution-generated HTML, but on this list that's evil. Sorry if the text conversion isn't great. The Pontis SP600 is news to me, and soon iPod, running (uC)linux and Tremor, should have playback support! Still a little rough, if anyone has suggestions, links, corrections, more info, please let me know. __________ ________________________________________________________________________ This is a list o...

Chris Lattner: > Comparing -O3 (and even -O4) is interesting, but we want all > optimization levels to perform better than GCC :). Lots of people use > -O2 and -Os, so comparing against other compiler's -O2 and -Os levels > is just as interesting as comparing -O3 vs -O3. > My thinking was that, for instance, -02 for GCC and -02 for LLVM(-GCC) do not necessarily mean

screw that site, its useless info run by a linux gnu zealot. 2009/9/14 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>: > On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php? >> page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1 > > Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what > architecture is compiled for etc.

...eived lack of hardware support keeps many people from using Vorbis. I think there should be a list of Vorbis-supporting hardware right on vorbis.com. There are already a few non-PC devices that can play Vorbis (DP-450 DVD player, Zaurus, Palm), as well as rumors of support to come (<http://www.pontis.de/site_e/produkte/pl_600_e.htm>), efforts to support Vorbis on portable MP3 players, (iRiver, Neuros) and random links like <http://www.phatnoise.com/products/index.php> and <http://www.kenwoodusa.com/excelon/excelonKeg.jsp> that I just found on Slashdot in the "FLAC joins Xip...

On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote: > Olivier Meurant: >> I have run the john the ripper test. >> I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from >> http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2 >> >> To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc. >> I have used the following command to build

On 27.04.2010, at 12:37, Renato Golin wrote: > On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti > <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote: >> FYI >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1 > > For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the > former is really important), but for the rest, especially those

Since we are in the area, what *should* O1 do? It's basically good for nothing, since it doesn't tune for size or performance. The only good I personally ever have for it is once in a while there is a miscompile at -O1 which narrows the problem. Would it be crazy to make -O1 equivalent to -Os? - Daniel On Wednesday, September 16, 2009, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>

Hello list members, I am running NUT 2.0.1 on an OpenBSD 3.8 system, using the OpenBSD port for net-snmp-5.1.2p2. The UPS is connected via an AP9606 Web/SNMP card with current firmware, and the LAN. All goes well for a long time, usually more than one month. Then the system starts spitting messages about losing communications with the UPS. A second message about reconnecting follows immediately.

Interesting project I've discovered yesterday: http://www.libcpu.org/ Stefano

Hi, I am having a problem provisioning Samba4 beta5 as ADC in existing Active Directory domain. The error I get is below: ../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c:164: Failed to find GUID for dn (null) replmd_op_callback failure. Error is: Invalid DN syntax Failed to apply records: Failed to find GUID for (null): Invalid DN syntax Failed to commit objects: WERR_GENERAL_FAILURE