Displaying 19 results from an estimated 19 matches for "ponti".
Did you mean:
conti
2003 Sep 27
1
Pontis and vorbis change.
Hi,
After reading the wiki about Pontis changing the webpage, I wrote and asked
their tech. support about it. I've gotten the ansver a while ago and forgot
to share it until now. I dont know what to make of it...
Also made a small update at the wiki.
/Joel
---------begin forwarded message---------
Hello,
we've still to solv...
2010 Apr 27
3
[LLVMdev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
FYI
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1
2010 Apr 27
0
[LLVMdev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti
<stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote:
> FYI
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1
For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the
former is really important), but for the rest, especially those with
image/sound proces...
2009 Sep 16
4
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
Olivier Meurant:
> I have run the john the ripper test.
> I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from
> http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2
>
> To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc.
> I have used the following command to build : make clean linux-x86-sse2
> (seems to be the best on x86-32)
> The makefile
2009 Sep 14
2
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1
Regards,
Stefano
2009 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote:
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?
> page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1
Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what
architecture is compiled for etc. It's entirely possible that they
are accidentally compiling the llvm-gcc binaries for x86-3...
2009 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Stefano Delli Ponti <
stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't know what you think about this, but shouldn't it be more
> meaningful to make these tests with -O3? I mean, we ought to make the
> comparisons with the highest level of optimization available for both of
> the compilers....
2009 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote:
> Chris Lattner:
>> Comparing -O3 (and even -O4) is interesting, but we want all
>> optimization levels to perform better than GCC :). Lots of people
>> use -O2 and -Os, so comparing against other compiler's -O2 and -Os
>> levels is just as interesti...
2010 Apr 27
1
[LLVMdev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 09:37:53AM +0100, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti
> <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote:
> > FYI
> > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1
>
> For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the
> former is really important), but for the rest, especially...
2003 Feb 04
2
Hardware List Draft
...tes, including
relevant correspondence I've had with the companies, which probably
needn't be put on the web page.
The projects part is still a little sketchy. I have this as
Evolution-generated HTML, but on this list that's evil. Sorry if the
text conversion isn't great.
The Pontis SP600 is news to me, and soon iPod, running (uC)linux and
Tremor, should have playback support!
Still a little rough, if anyone has suggestions, links, corrections,
more info, please let me know.
__________
________________________________________________________________________
This is a list...
2009 Sep 16
2
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
Chris Lattner:
> Comparing -O3 (and even -O4) is interesting, but we want all
> optimization levels to perform better than GCC :). Lots of people use
> -O2 and -Os, so comparing against other compiler's -O2 and -Os levels
> is just as interesting as comparing -O3 vs -O3.
>
My thinking was that, for instance, -02 for GCC and -02 for LLVM(-GCC)
do not necessarily mean
2009 Sep 14
3
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
screw that site, its useless info run by a linux gnu zealot.
2009/9/14 Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com>:
> On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:20 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote:
>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?
>> page=article&item=apple_llvm_gcc&num=1
>
> Unfortunately, they don't specify what flags are used, what
> architecture is compiled for etc. It's entirely possible that they
> are accidentally compiling the l...
2003 Jan 29
1
Hardware list on vorbis.com
...eived lack of hardware support keeps many people from using Vorbis.
I think there should be a list of Vorbis-supporting hardware right on
vorbis.com.
There are already a few non-PC devices that can play Vorbis (DP-450 DVD
player, Zaurus, Palm), as well as rumors of support to come
(<http://www.pontis.de/site_e/produkte/pl_600_e.htm>), efforts to
support Vorbis on portable MP3 players, (iRiver, Neuros) and random
links like <http://www.phatnoise.com/products/index.php> and
<http://www.kenwoodusa.com/excelon/excelonKeg.jsp> that I just found on
Slashdot in the "FLAC joins Xi...
2009 Sep 16
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
On Sep 16, 2009, at 6:46 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote:
> Olivier Meurant:
>> I have run the john the ripper test.
>> I have used the official archive (same version as phoronix) from
>> http://www.openwall.com/john/g/john-1.7.3.1.tar.bz2
>>
>> To build with llvm-gcc, replace the line CC = gcc with CC = llvm-gcc....
2010 Apr 27
1
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Phoronix: Benchmarking LLVM & Clang Against GCC 4.5
On 27.04.2010, at 12:37, Renato Golin wrote:
> On 27 April 2010 08:18, Stefano Delli Ponti
> <stefano.delliponti at gmail.com> wrote:
>> FYI
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=gcc_llvm_clang&num=1
>
> For Apache and Dhrystone, the performance boost is good (but only the
> former is really important), but for the rest, especially t...
2009 Sep 16
5
[LLVMdev] FYI: Phoronix GCC vs. LLVM-GCC benchmarks
...onally ever have for it is once in a
while there is a miscompile at -O1 which narrows the problem.
Would it be crazy to make -O1 equivalent to -Os?
- Daniel
On Wednesday, September 16, 2009, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> On Sep 16, 2009, at 10:05 AM, Stefano Delli Ponti wrote:
>
>> Chris Lattner:
>>> Comparing -O3 (and even -O4) is interesting, but we want all
>>> optimization levels to perform better than GCC :). Lots of people
>>> use -O2 and -Os, so comparing against other compiler's -O2 and -Os
>>> levels is...
2006 Jan 04
1
Nut 2.0.1, net-snmp-5.1.2p2, APC SUA1000 with AP9606: repeated comm lost/established messages
Hello list members,
I am running NUT 2.0.1 on an OpenBSD 3.8 system, using the OpenBSD port for
net-snmp-5.1.2p2. The UPS is connected via an AP9606 Web/SNMP card with
current firmware, and the LAN. All goes well for a long time, usually more
than one month. Then the system starts spitting messages about losing
communications with the UPS. A second message about reconnecting follows
immediately.
2010 Jan 14
0
[LLVMdev] FYI: libcpu
Interesting project I've discovered yesterday:
http://www.libcpu.org/
Stefano
2012 Aug 12
0
Problem joining Samba4 beta5 as DC to exisitng AD domain with Exchange 2010
Hi,
I am having a problem provisioning Samba4 beta5 as ADC in existing Active Directory domain.
The error I get is below:
../source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c:164: Failed to find GUID for dn (null)
replmd_op_callback failure. Error is: Invalid DN syntax
Failed to apply records: Failed to find GUID for (null): Invalid DN syntax
Failed to commit objects: WERR_GENERAL_FAILURE