search for: polyinstantiator

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "polyinstantiator".

2008 Mar 26
4
[LLVMdev] Hooking the global symbol resolver
...om main() until all calls are statically resolved. It seems to me, however, that this duplicates (nearly) functionality that is probably already present in the LLVM JIT layer. Here is what I am wondering: Is there some way we can "hook" the global symbol resolver so that we can run the polyinstantiator on demand? I *think* this could be done by running the resolver normally, noticing failure on a symbol that we know ought to exist, code generating the instance definition corresponding to the needed symbol, and then re-performing the lookup at global scope. What I'm not sure about here is sev...
2008 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] Hooking the global symbol resolver
...resolved. > > It seems to me, however, that this duplicates (nearly) functionality > that is probably already present in the LLVM JIT layer. > > Here is what I am wondering: > > Is there some way we can "hook" the global symbol resolver so that > we can run the polyinstantiator on demand? I *think* this could be > done by running the resolver normally, noticing failure on a symbol > that we know ought to exist, code generating the instance definition > corresponding to the needed symbol, and then re-performing the > lookup at global scope. > > Wh...
2008 Mar 27
2
[LLVMdev] Hooking the global symbol resolver
...equence that GlobalScope will have been // updated to contain a binding for the desired symbol. sym = llvm_resolve_global(GlobalScope, symName); if (!sym) some_failure_action(); I don't think that it's any more complicated than that. This is basically the test that our static polyinstantiator runs right now. Note: I'm still not claiming that this is a good approach in the context of LLVM. I don't have my head wrapped around LLVM enough to have an opinion about that. I simply wanted to make sure that the question was clearly framed. I do, provisionally, think that this particul...
2023 Dec 07
3
[Bug 3641] New: Improved SELinux support for openssh
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3641 Bug ID: 3641 Summary: Improved SELinux support for openssh Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 9.5p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous Assignee: unassigned-bugs at
2008 Mar 27
0
[LLVMdev] Hooking the global symbol resolver
...been > // updated to contain a binding for the desired symbol. > sym = llvm_resolve_global(GlobalScope, symName); > if (!sym) > some_failure_action(); > > I don't think that it's any more complicated than that. This is > basically the test that our static polyinstantiator runs right now. > > Note: I'm still not claiming that this is a good approach in the context > of LLVM. I don't have my head wrapped around LLVM enough to have an > opinion about that. I simply wanted to make sure that the question was > clearly framed. > > I do, provis...
2008 Mar 06
0
[ANNOUNCE] xorg-server 1.4.99.901
Aaron Plattner (11): Bug #12015: Use the right offsets in the dst arguments of pixman_blt. stride is in FbBits-sized chunks, but xoff is not. Bump video driver ABI for pci-rework. Set noCompositeExtension to TRUE when failing to initialize the extension (e.g. when Xinerama is enabled). Don't segfault on shutdown if we never managed to connect to dbus.
2020 Oct 21
6
"Semi-Trusted" SSH-Keys that also require PAM login
Hello all, in order to connect to my SSH servers from untrusted devices like company computers or my smartphone, I set up 2FA with google-authenticator hooked into PAM. However, this is not really 2FA at least for the smartphone, since I use the same device for generating the TANs and it is also at least inconvenient to always require a new TAN for each connection. I do not want to solely rely