Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "poly64_t".
Did you mean:
poly64x2_t
2014 Dec 13
2
[LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase Begins
...arning: implicit declaration of function 'vmovq_n_p64' is invalid in
C99 [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
result = vmovq_n_p64(arg1);
^
SingleSource/UnitTests/Vector/AArch64/aarch64_neon_intrinsics.c:154979:14:
error: assigning to 'poly64x2_t' (vector of 2 'poly64_t' values) from
incompatible type 'int'
result = vmovq_n_p64(arg1);
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1 warning and 1 error generated.
Tim, any ideas?
cheers,
--renato
2014 Dec 13
5
[LLVMdev] 3.5.1 Testing Phase Begins
You're not the only one Hans, my VMs have started crashing my host OS :)
Fedora and OpenSUSE look good, binaries uploaded.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > 3.5.1-rc1 has been tagged, so it is time to begin testing. We